Cited by 3,688Behavioral Health and InterventionsDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsEnvironmental Education and Sustainability

Intention—Behavior Relations: A Conceptual and Empirical Review

Sheeran, Paschal·2002·European Review of Social Psychology

Abstract

This chapter addresses two questions; how big is the “gap” between intentions and behavior, and what psychological variables might be able to “bridge” the intention–behavior gap? A meta-analysis of meta-analyses is used to quantify the gap and a conceptual analysis of intention–behavior discrepancies is presented. Research is described on the extent to which four groups of variables—behavior type, intention type, properties of intention, and cognitive and personality variables—moderate intention–behavior relations. Finally, the scope of the intention construct is discussed in the light of recent evidence concerning the role of habits and automaticity in human behavior.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14792772143000003

Cites

144 of 144 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sheeran, P.
Affiliations
University of Sheffield (GB)
Corresponding author
Sheeran, Paschal
Venue
European Review of Social Psychology
Published
2002-01
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
1-36
ISSN
  • 1046-3283 (ISSN-L)
  • 1479-277X
OpenAlex
W2070257463
Cited by
3,688
References
141
Citations by year
2026: 358 · 2025: 268 · 2024: 231 · 2023: 231 · 2022: 258 · 2021: 234 · 2020: 245 · 2019: 260 · 2018: 203 · 2017: 197 · 2016: 194 · 2015: 167 · 2014: 152 · 2013: 151 · 2012: 111
FWCI
39.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
European Review of Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental Education and Sustainability
Keywords
intention-behavior gap, behavioral intention, behavior types, cognitive factors, personality factors, habit, automaticity, moderators

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review