Spatial cognitive maps in animals: New hypotheses on their structure and neural mechanisms.
Abstract
This article provides a hierarchical model of animal spatial cognitive maps. Such maps include both topological information, which affords loose, yet operational, representations of the connectivity of space and its overall arrangement, and metric information, which provides information about angles and distances. The model holds that maps can be initially described as a set of location-dependent reference frameworks providing directional information about other locations. The addition of an overall directional reference allows for the buildup of more complete (allocentric) representations. A survey of recent neurobiological data provides some hints about the brain structures involved in these processes and suggests that the hippocampal formation and the posterior parietal cortex would act differently by handling topological and metric information, respectively.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
As a whole, these results indicate that teleost fish, like mammals, birds, and reptilians, can use allocentric strategies to solve spatial tasks.
“As a whole, these results indicate that teleost fish, like mammals [39,48,65,68,96], birds [97,98,99,100], and reptilians [101,102], can use allocentric strategies to solve spatial tasks.”
From Spatial Cognition in Teleost Fish: Strategies and Mechanisms (2021) · cites this paper as [48]
The influence of stored knowledge on segmentation of environments into subregions is suggested by studies showing that human spatial representations are prone to systematic biases and may be hierarchically organized, similar to semantic and event knowledge.
“The influence of stored knowledge on segmentation of environments into subregions is suggested by studies showing that human spatial representations are prone to systematic biases 136,137 and may be hierarchically organized, similar to semantic and event knowledge 133,138,139 .”
From From cognitive maps to spatial schemas (2023) · cites this paper as [137]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 108 · Cited by 434
- Authors
- Poucet, B.
- Affiliations
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Poucet, Bruno
- ORCID
- Poucet, Bruno
- Venue
- Psychological Review
- Published
- 1993
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 163-182
- ISSN
- 0033-295X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1471
- OpenAlex
- W2003257293
- Cited by
- 434
- References
- 108
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 33.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Review (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
- Keywords
- topological maps, metric maps, allocentric spatial representation, hippocampal formation, posterior parietal cortex, spatial navigation
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Attention, Brain, Brain Mapping, Distance Perception, Hippocampus, Orientation, Parietal Lobe, Mental Recall, Space Perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review