The DOI matches its Crossref record; 88 of the 88 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating
Abstract
This article proposes a contextual-evolutionary theory of human mating strategies. Both men and women are hypothesized to have evolved distinct psychological mechanisms that underlie short-term and long-term strategies. Men and women confront different adaptive problems in short-term as opposed to long-term mating contexts. Consequently, different mate preferences become activated from their strategic repertoires. Nine key hypotheses and 22 predictions from Sexual Strategies Theory are outlined and tested empirically. Adaptive problems sensitive to context include sexual accessibility, fertility assessment, commitment seeking and avoidance, immediate and enduring resource procurement, paternity certainty, assessment of mate value, and parental investment. Discussion summarizes 6 additional sources of behavioral data, outlines adaptive problems common to both sexes, and suggests additional contexts likely to cause shifts in mating strategy.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Women have evolved to be the “choosier sex” when selecting a mating partner, as there is a greater investment of resources in offspring [37,38].”
From Does Relationship-Contingent Self-Esteem Play a Role in the Stress to Impaired Control Pathway to Alcohol-Related Problems in a College Student Sample? (2023) · cites this paper as [37]
In the citing paper
“Evolutionary theory suggests a biological basis for sex differences in partnering preferences, indicating women may be more likely to prefer long-term relationships because they will have a greater personal investment in children resulting from sexual encounters due to the long-term commitment of pregnancy and nursing, while men also prefer long-term relationships but may be more interested than”
From The role of culture in explaining college students’ selection into hookups, dates, and long-term romantic relationships (2016) · cites this paper as Buss & Schmitt, 1993
In the citing paper
“Social norms can shape desired partnership types, desired types of partners, and interact with market forces to shape structural opportunities to meet potential partners with complementary preferences in contexts that facilitate romantic and/or sexual partnering (Buss & Schmitt, 1993).”
From The role of culture in explaining college students’ selection into hookups, dates, and long-term romantic relationships (2016) · cites this paper as Buss & Schmitt, 1993
In the citing paper
“However, unlike prairie voles, which display a consistently strong partner preference, marmosets display a flexible pattern of sociosexual preferences (Smith et al., 2010; Cavanaugh et al., 2014), similar to those displayed by humans (Buss and Schmitt, 1993).”
From Marmosets treated with oxytocin are more socially attractive to their long-term mate (2015) · cites this paper as Buss and Schmitt, 1993
In the citing paper
“However, unlike prairie voles, which display consistently strong sociosexual preferences for a long-term partner over an opposite-sex stranger (Wang and Aragona, 2004), marmosets display a flexible pattern of sociosexual preferences, similar to those displayed by humans (Buss and Schmitt, 1993), including a willingness to interact with a potential mate in the absence of a pair-mate (Evans, 1983;”
From Oxytocin facilitates fidelity in well-established marmoset pairs by reducing sociosexual behavior toward opposite-sex strangers (2014) · cites this paper as Buss and Schmitt, 1993
Citations
Cites
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
Cohen, J. (1990) · Computers Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/0198-9715(90)90050-4 · Cited by 65,417
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.).
Lachenbruch, P. A., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2290095 · Cited by 37,421
The genetical theory of natural selection
Fisher, R. A. (1930) · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.27468 · Cited by 17,617
The descent of man and selection in relation to sex
チャールス, ダ., & 茂穂, 田. (1907) · Tokyo Jinrui Gakkai zasshi · doi:10.1537/ase1887.22.495 · Cited by 10,909
Parental Investment and Sexual Selection
Trivers, R. L. (2017) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315129266-7 · Cited by 10,902
Statistical Methods for Psychology.
Gudgeon, A. C., & Howell, D. C. (1994) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series D (The Statistician) · doi:10.2307/2348956 · Cited by 8,277
Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man
(2017) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315129266 · Cited by 7,287
Sexual Behavior in the Human Male
Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. R., & Martin, C. E. (1948) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.1093/ptj/28.2.93 · Cited by 5,577
The Adapted mind : evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture
Barkow, J. H., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1992) · Cited by 5,222
Sexual Behavior in the Human Female
Oyler, M. D., Kinsey, A., Pomeroy, W. B., Martin, C. E., & Gebhard, P. (1954) · Harvard Law Review · doi:10.2307/1336986 · Cited by 4,609
Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures
Buss, D. M. (1989) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00023992 · Cited by 4,484
Self-citationAdaptation and Natural Selection
Williams, G. C. (2008) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781400820108 · Cited by 3,930
Heritable True Fitness and Bright Birds: A Role for Parasites?
Hamilton, W. D., & Zuk, M. (1982) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7123238 · Cited by 3,733
The Evolution of Parental Care
Clutton‐Brock, T. H. (2019) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctvs32ssj · Cited by 3,143
Passions within reason: the strategic role of the emotions
(1989) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.26-4535 · Cited by 2,971
(1979) · Cited by 2,524
Sexual Behavior in the Human Female
Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., & Martin, C. E. (1954) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.1093/ptj/34.1.50 · Cited by 2,242
Williams, G. C. (1975) · PubMed · Cited by 2,177
Rusbult, C. E. (1983) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.1.101 · Cited by 1,853
Alexander, R. D. (2017) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203700976 · Cited by 1,695
Preferences in human mate selection.
Buss, D. M., & Barnes, M. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.50.3.559 · Cited by 1,432
Self-citationSex Differences in Jealousy: Evolution, Physiology, and Psychology
Buss, D. M., Larsen, R. J., Westen, D., & Semmelroth, J. (1992) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00038.x · Cited by 1,263
Self-citationEvolutionary Biology and Human Social Behavior: An Anthropological Perspective.
Wilson, P. J., Chagnon, N. A., & Irons, W. (1980) · Man · doi:10.2307/2801385 · Cited by 1,232
Nielsen, J. M., Daly, M., & WILSON, M. I. (1980) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2064296 · Cited by 1,188
Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1990) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1990.tb00907.x · Cited by 1,013
Evolutionary Personality Psychology
Buss, D. M. (1991) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.42.020191.002331 · Cited by 930
Self-citationThe evolution of human intrasexual competition: tactics of mate attraction.
Buss, D. (1988) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.4.616 · Cited by 920
Self-citationBramblett, C. A., & Hrdy, S. B. (1982) · Man · doi:10.2307/2801756 · Cited by 900
Age preferences in mates reflect sex differences in human reproductive strategies
Kenrick, D. T., & Keefe, R. C. (1992) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00067595 · Cited by 860
Chagnon, N. A. (1968) · Andalas University Repository (Andalas University) · Cited by 805
Smuts, B. B., & Smuts, R. W. (1993) · Advances in the study of behavior · doi:10.1016/s0065-3454(08)60404-0 · Cited by 764
Stone, A., Ford, C. S., & Beach, F. A. (1951) · Marriage and Family Living · doi:10.2307/348578 · Cited by 754
Daly, M., Wilson, M. I., & Weghorst, S. (1982) · Ethology and Sociobiology · doi:10.1016/0162-3095(82)90027-9 · Cited by 753
Evolution, Traits, and the Stages of Human Courtship: Qualifying the Parental Investment Model
Kenrick, D. T., Sadalla, E. K., Groth, G., & Trost, M. R. (1990) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1990.tb00909.x · Cited by 729
Nisa: The Life and Words of a !Kung Woman.
Warren, K. B., & Shostak, M. (1983) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2066812 · Cited by 718
Gender Differences in Receptivity to Sexual Offers
Clark, R. D. (1989) · Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality · doi:10.1300/j056v02n01_04 · Cited by 656
The evolution of human intrasexual competition: Tactics of mate attraction.
Buss, D. M. (1988) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.54.4.616 · Cited by 651
Self-citationBuss, D. M. (1988) · Ethology and Sociobiology · doi:10.1016/0162-3095(88)90010-6 · Cited by 636
Self-citationDespotism and Differential Reproduction: A Darwinian View of History.
Vining, D. R., & Betzig, L. L. (1988) · Population and Development Review · doi:10.2307/1973632 · Cited by 621
Johnson, D. J., & Rusbult, C. E. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.967 · Cited by 566
Rozin, P. N., & VOLLMECKE, T. A. (1986) · Annual Review of Nutrition · doi:10.1146/annurev.nu.06.070186.002245 · Cited by 555
Causes of Conjugal Dissolution: A Cross-cultural Study
Betzig, L. (1989) · Current Anthropology · doi:10.1086/203798 · Cited by 518
Toward an Evolutionary History of Female Sociosexual Variation
Gangestad, S. W., & Simpson, J. A. (1990) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1990.tb00908.x · Cited by 462
Interpersonal Processes In Close Relationships
Clark, M. S., & Reis, H. T. (1988) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.39.020188.003141 · Cited by 445
Sociobiology and psychology : ideas, issues, and applications
Crawford, C., Smith, M., & Krebs, D. L. (1987) · Lawrence Erlbaum Associates eBooks · Cited by 440
Sex differences in sexual fantasy: An evolutionary psychological approach
Ellis, B. J., & Symons, D. (1990) · The Journal of Sex Research · doi:10.1080/00224499009551579 · Cited by 432
On the Use and Misuse of Darwinism in the Study of Human Behavior
Symons, D. (1992) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195060232.003.0003 · Cited by 427
Buss, D. M. (1985) · Cited by 423
Self-citationHuman rape: An evolutionary analysis
Thornhill, R., & Thornhill, N. W. (1983) · Ethology and Sociobiology · doi:10.1016/0162-3095(83)90027-4 · Cited by 398
The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Chattel
WILSON, M. I., & Daly, M. (1992) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195060232.003.0008 · Cited by 396
Sociosexuality and Romantic Partner Choice
Simpson, J. A., & Gangestad, S. W. (1992) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00264.x · Cited by 395
Facial attractiveness, developmental stability, and fluctuating asymmetry
Gangestad, S. W., Thornhill, R., & Yeo, R. A. (1994) · Ethology and Sociobiology · doi:10.1016/0162-3095(94)90018-3 · Cited by 395
Appearance and Education in Marriage Mobility
Elder, G. H. (1969) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2091961 · Cited by 393
Genetic similarity, human altruism, and group selection
Rushton, J. P. (1989) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00057320 · Cited by 384
(2006) · doi:10.5040/9798216013310.0005 · Cited by 381
Smuts, B. B. (1992) · Human Nature · doi:10.1007/bf02692265 · Cited by 381
Assortative mating, or who marries whom?
Vandenberg, S. G. (1972) · Behavior Genetics · doi:10.1007/bf01065686 · Cited by 368
Conflict between the sexes: Strategic interference and the evocation of anger and upset.
Buss, D. M. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.56.5.735 · Cited by 368
Self-citationPatterns of deception in intersexual and intrasexual mating strategies
Tooke, W., & Camire, L. (1991) · Ethology and Sociobiology · doi:10.1016/0162-3095(91)90030-t · Cited by 303
Barnes, M. L., & Sternberg, R. J. (1988) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 302
Townsend, J. M. (1989) · Ethology and Sociobiology · doi:10.1016/0162-3095(89)90002-2 · Cited by 274
Human assortative mating and genetic equilibrium: An evolutionary perspective
Thiessen, D. D., & Gregg, B. (1980) · Ethology and Sociobiology · doi:10.1016/0162-3095(80)90003-5 · Cited by 273
The Biology of Moral SystemsRichard D. Alexander New York: Aldine De Gruyter, 1987
Barner-Barry, C. (1988) · Politics and the Life Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0730938400003816 · Cited by 267
Balikci, A., Hart, C. W. M., & Pilling, A. R. (1961) · Anthropologica · doi:10.2307/25604498 · Cited by 260
Mate selection in man: Evidence, theory, and outcome
Epstein, E. E., & Guttman, R. (1984) · Biodemography and Social Biology · doi:10.1080/19485565.1984.9988579 · Cited by 235
Human sperm competition: ejaculate manipulation by females and a function for the female orgasm
Baker, R. R., & Bellis, M. A. (1993) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1006/anbe.1993.1272 · Cited by 226
Secular trends in human sex ratios
Pedersen, F. A. (1991) · Human Nature · doi:10.1007/bf02692189 · Cited by 225
Stimulus. Value. Role: A Theory of Marital Choice
Murstein, B. I. (1970) · Journal of Marriage and the Family · doi:10.2307/350113 · Cited by 214
The Utility of Education and Attractiveness for Females' Status Attainment Through Marriage
Taylor, P. A., & Glenn, N. D. (1976) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2094255 · Cited by 209
Campus Values in Mate Selection: A Replication
Hudson, J. W., & Henze, L. F. (1969) · Journal of Marriage and the Family · doi:10.2307/349321 · Cited by 204
Benefits of Being Attractive: Differential Payoffs for Men and Women
Udry, J. R., & Eckland, B. K. (1984) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.1984.54.1.47 · Cited by 200
Gender differences in mate selection criteria: Sociobiological or socioeconomic explanation?
Wiederman, M. W., & Allgeier, E. R. (1992) · Ethology and Sociobiology · doi:10.1016/0162-3095(92)90021-u · Cited by 181
Personality and sexual relations.
Snyder, M., Simpson, J. A., & Gangestad, S. W. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.1.181 · Cited by 180
The psychology of individual and group differences
Willerman, L. (1979) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 169
Eckland, B. K. (1968) · Social Biology · doi:10.1080/19485565.1968.9987759 · Cited by 144
Campus Values in Mate Selection: A Repeat Study
McGinnis, R. (1958) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2573978 · Cited by 133
Cattell, R. B., & Nesselroade, J. R. (1967) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0025248 · Cited by 125
The evolutionary psychology of sexual harassment in organizations
Studd, M. V., & Gattiker, U. Ε. (1991) · Ethology and Sociobiology · doi:10.1016/0162-3095(91)90021-h · Cited by 118
The Immoral Landscape: Female Prostitution in Western Societies
Stanko, E. A., & Symanski, R. (1982) · Economic Geography · doi:10.2307/143466 · Cited by 115
Barkow, J. H. (1989) · Cited by 104
Perceptions of similarly and dissimilarly attractive couples and individuals.
Bar‐Tal, D., & Saxe, L. (1976) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.33.6.772 · Cited by 83
Sternberg, R. J. (1988) · Cited by 70
Human serial polygyny: Demographic, reproductive, marital, and divorce data
Lockard, J. S., & Adams, R. M. (1981) · Ethology and Sociobiology · doi:10.1016/0162-3095(81)90002-9 · Cited by 49
Wealth, polygyny, and reproductive success
Dawkins, R. (1986) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00022020 · Cited by 48
Secord, P. F. (1983) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167283094002 · Cited by 44
The evolution of female sexuality and mate selection in humans
Small, M. F. (1992) · Human Nature · doi:10.1007/bf02692250 · Cited by 26
Time to integrate sociobiology and social psychology
Kenrick, D. T., & Keefe, R. C. (1989) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00024122 · Cited by 17
Gangestad, S. W. (1989) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-0634-4_25 · Cited by 6
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Social Cognitive Theory: An Agentic Perspective
Bandura, A. (2001) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1 · Cited by 15,510
Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review
Langlois, J. H., Kalakanis, L., Rubenstein, A. J., Larson, A., Hallam, M., & Smoot, M. (2000) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.126.3.390 · Cited by 2,429
Social cognitive theory of gender development and differentiation.
Bussey, K., & Bandura, A. (1999) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.106.4.676 · Cited by 2,476
Depue, R. A., & Collins, P. F. (1999) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x99002046 · Cited by 2,046
Social Cognitive Theory: An Agentic Perspective
Bandura, A. (1999) · Asian Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/1467-839x.00024 · Cited by 2,050
Metadata
- Authors
- Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- Venue
- Psychological Review
- Published
- 1993
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 204-232
- ISSN
- 0033-295X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1471
- OpenAlex
- W1971871412
- Cited by
- 4,253
- References
- 87
- Citations by year
- 2026: 98 · 2025: 97 · 2024: 127 · 2023: 210 · 2022: 178 · 2021: 240 · 2020: 323 · 2019: 221 · 2018: 216 · 2017: 172 · 2016: 195 · 2015: 234 · 2014: 197 · 2013: 179 · 2012: 182
- FWCI
- 63.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Review (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5r01mh044206-03)
- National Institute of Mental Health (MH44206)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
- Keywords
- sexual strategies theory, human mating strategies, short-term mating, long-term mating, mate preferences, fertility assessment, commitment, resource procurement, paternity certainty, mate value, parental investment, sex differences, evolutionary psychology
- MeSH terms
- Biological Evolution, Female, Gender Identity, Humans, Male, Problem Solving, Sexual Behavior, Social Environment, Social Values, Parenting
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review