Information foraging.
Cited by (71)
- Social and Heuristic Approaches to Credibility Evaluation OnlineMetzger, Miriam J., Flanagin, Andrew J., Medders, Ryan B. · 2010 · Journal of Communication
- Progress in evidence-based medicine: a quarter century onDjulbegovic, Benjamin, Guyatt, Gordon H · 2017 · The Lancet
- In Google We Trust: Users’ Decisions on Rank, Position, and RelevancePan, Bing, Hembrooke, Helene, Joachims, Thorsten, Lorigo, Lori, Gay, Geri, Granka, Laura · 2007 · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication
- An Exploratory Study of How Developers Seek, Relate, and Collect Relevant Information during Software Maintenance TasksKo, Amy J., Myers, Brad A., Coblenz, Michael J., Aung, Htet Htet · 2006 · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
- The Building Blocks of InterpretabilityOlah, Chris, Satyanarayan, Arvind, Johnson, Ian, Carter, Shan, Schubert, Ludwig, Ye, Katherine, Mordvintsev, Alexander · 2018 · Distill
Related (10)
- Susquehanna Chorale Spring Concert "Roots and Wings"Deborah Hawkins · 2017
- Differential time allocation of foraging workers in the subterranean termiteSang‐Bin Lee, Thomas Chouvenc, Nan‐Yao Su · 2021 · Frontiers in Zoology
- Individual foraging in the antPachycondyla apicalisSimon Goss, Dominique Fresneau, J. L. Deneubourg, Jean-Paul Lachaud, Jorge Valenzuela · 1989 · Oecologia
- Foraging ecology of the thermophilic Australian desert ant, Melophorus bagotiBarbara Muser, Stefan Sommer, Harald Wolf · 2005 · Australian Journal of Zoology
- South for the winter? Within‐dive foraging effort reveals the trade‐offs between divergent foraging strategies in a free‐ranging predatorBenjamin Arthur, Mark Andrew Hindell, Marthán N Bester, W. Chris Oosthuizen, Mia Wege, Mary‐Anne Lea · 2016 · Functional Ecology
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Information foraging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0033-295x.106.4.643
- The paper
- Pirolli, P., & Card, S. (1999). Information foraging. Psychological Review. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295x.106.4.643