Cited by 591Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)Adversarial Robustness in Machine LearningScientific Computing and Data Management

The Building Blocks of Interpretability

Open access
Olah, Chris, Satyanarayan, Arvind, Johnson, Ian, Carter, Shan, Schubert, Ludwig, Ye, Katherine, Mordvintsev, Alexander·2018·Distill

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.23915/distill.00010

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Interpretability methods would be required to determine whether the system has acquired a learned model of output-input contingencies in the course of training.

    “Interpretability methods, such as examining the information encoded in hidden layers (Olah et al. 2018), would be required to determine whether the system has acquired such a model in the course of training.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Olah, C., Satyanarayan, A., Johnson, I., Carter, S., Schubert, L., Ye, K., & Mordvintsev, A.
Affiliations
  • Google (United States) (US)
  • Google Cloud
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Venue
Distill
Published
2018-03-06
Volume
3
Issue
3
ISSN
2476-0757 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2792641098
Cited by
591
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 71 · 2021: 89 · 2020: 112 · 2019: 101 · 2018: 65 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
51.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
Distill (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Scientific Computing and Data Management
Keywords
interpretability, explainable AI, model interpretability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review