The DOI matches its Crossref record; 164 of the 165 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Inhibitory control in mind and brain: An interactive race model of countermanding saccades.
Abstract
The stop-signal task has been used to study normal cognitive control and clinical dysfunction. Its utility is derived from a race model that accounts for performance and provides an estimate of the time it takes to stop a movement. This model posits a race between go and stop processes with stochastically independent finish times. However, neurophysiological studies demonstrate that the neural correlates of the go and stop processes produce movements through a network of interacting neurons. The juxtaposition of the computational model with the neural data exposes a paradox-how can a network of interacting units produce behavior that appears to be the outcome of an independent race? The authors report how a simple, competitive network can solve this paradox and provide an account of what is measured by stop-signal reaction time.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Boucher et al. [64] proposed an interactive race model, in which the go and stop process are independent for much of their latencies and interact strongly near the end (Figure III).”
From Response inhibition in the stop-signal paradigm (2008) · cites this paper as [64]
In the citing paper
“In this model, SSRT primarily reflects the period before the stop unit is activated, during which stop and go processing are independent, so its predictions correspond to those of the independent race model [64].”
From Response inhibition in the stop-signal paradigm (2008) · cites this paper as [64]
In the citing paper
“In situations when there is a conflict, for instance when the subject has to inhibit a planned saccade by a stop signal introduced with a short delay after the target onset, the behavior becomes probabilistic (the saccade is suppressed on some trials, but not on other trials) (Logan and Cowan, 1984; Boucher et al., 2007).”
From Decision Making in Recurrent Neuronal Circuits (2008) · cites this paper as Boucher et al., 2007
Citations
Cites
A Simplex Method for Function Minimization
Nelder, J. A., & Mead, R. (1965) · The Computer Journal · doi:10.1093/comjnl/7.4.308 · Cited by 28,905
Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1006/cogp.1999.0734 · Cited by 15,798
Parallel organization of functionally segregated circuits linking basal ganglia and cortex
Alexander, G. E., DeLong, M. R., & Strick, P. L. (1986) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.09.030186.002041 · Cited by 8,527
Ratcliff, R. (1978) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.85.2.59 · Cited by 4,513
On the ability to inhibit thought and action: a theory of an act of control
Logan, G. D., & Cowan, W. B. (1984) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.91.3.295 · Cited by 2,590
Self-citationInhibitory Processes in Attention, Memory and Language
Carr, T. H., & Dagenbach, D. (1994) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,276
Bergum, B. O., Long, J. B., & Baddeley, A. (1982) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1422199 · Cited by 2,240
The Adaptive Character of Thought
Massaro, D. W., Friedman, D., & Anderson, J. R. (1991) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1423253 · Cited by 2,174
The time course of perceptual choice: The leaky, competing accumulator model.
Usher, M., & McClelland, J. L. (2001) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.108.3.550 · Cited by 2,152
Decision field theory: A dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment.
Busemeyer, J. R., & Townsend, J. T. (1993) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.100.3.432 · Cited by 1,925
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Diffusion decision model: Current issues and history
Ratcliff, R., Smith, P. L., Brown, S. D., & McKoon, G. (2016) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2016.01.007 · Cited by 1,630
“Relationships have been established between diffusion model analyses and behavioral measures such as eye tracking [128,137] and pupil dilation [142].”
BackgroundA taxonomy of external and internal attention.
Chun, M. M., Golomb, J. D., & Turk-Browne, N. B. (2011) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100427 · Cited by 1,472
Response inhibition in the stop-signal paradigm
Verbruggen, F., & Logan, G. D. (2008) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2008.07.005 · Cited by 1,373
Self-citationVerbruggen, F., Aron, A. R., Band, G. P., Beste, C., Bissett, P. G., Brockett, A. T., Brown, J. W., Chamberlain, S. R., Chambers, C. D., Colonius, H., et al. (2019) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.46323 · Cited by 990
Self-citationOn the ability to inhibit thought and action: General and special theories of an act of control.
Logan, G. D., Zandt, T. V., Verbruggen, F., & Wagenmakers, E. (2014) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0035230 · Cited by 911
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Boucher, L., Palmeri, T. J., Logan, G. D., & Schall, J. D.
- Affiliations
- Vanderbilt University (US)
- Venue
- Psychological Review
- Published
- 2007
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 376-397
- ISSN
- 0033-295X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1471
- OpenAlex
- W2150380514
- Cited by
- 485
- References
- 165
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 29
- FWCI
- 13.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Review (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- NSUWorks (Nova Southeastern University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- E. Bronson Ingram Chair
- National Science Foundation (BCS0218507; BCS0446806)
- National Institutes of Health (F32-EY016679; RO1-MH55806; RO1-EY13358; P30-EY08126; P30-HD015052)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Keywords
- inhibitory control, cognitive control, stop-signal task, race model, stop-signal reaction time, competitive neural networks, interacting neurons
- MeSH terms
- Brain, Cognition, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Saccades, Stochastic Processes, Signal Detection, Psychological
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
