Cited by 270Memory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and InfluencesNeural Networks and Applications

A layered network model of associative learning: learning to learn and configuration

Kehoe, E. James·1988·Psychological Review

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0033-295x.95.4.411

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kehoe, E. J.
Affiliations
UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Kehoe, E. James
Venue
Psychological Review
Published
1988
Volume
95
Issue
4
Pages
411-433
ISSN
  • 0033-295X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1471
OpenAlex
W1994863141
Cited by
270
References
3
Citations by year
2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 5
FWCI
19.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
Keywords
associative learning, layered network model, meta-learning, configuration, neural network model, memory retrieval, associative memory
MeSH terms
Animals, Association Learning, Cognition, Computer Simulation, Conditioning, Psychological, Form Perception, Humans, Learning, Models, Psychological, Pattern Recognition, Visual

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review