Cited by 1,808Memory and Neural MechanismsNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesBehavioral and Psychological Studies

Context and Behavioral Processes in Extinction: Table 1.

Open access
Bouton, Mark E.·2004·Learning & Memory

Abstract

This article provides a selective review and integration of the behavioral literature on Pavlovian extinction. The first part reviews evidence that extinction does not destroy the original learning, but instead generates new learning that is especially context-dependent. The second part examines insights provided by research on several related behavioral phenomena (the interference paradigms, conditioned inhibition, and inhibition despite reinforcement). The final part examines four potential causes of extinction: the discrimination of a new reinforcement rate, generalization decrement, response inhibition, and violation of a reinforcer expectation. The data are consistent with behavioral models that emphasize the role of generalization decrement and expectation violation, but would be more so if those models were expanded to better accommodate the finding that extinction involves a context-modulated form of inhibitory learning.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/lm.78804

Cites

133 of 133 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [56]56. Kimmel, H.D. and Burns, R.A. 1975. Adaptational aspects of conditioning. In Handbook of learning and cognitive processes: Conditioning and behavior theory, Vol. 2 (ed. W.K. Estes), pp. 99-142.
  2. [73]73. Overton, D.A. 1985. Contextual stimulus effects of drugs and internal states. In Context and learning (eds. P.D. Balsam and A. Tomie), pp. 357-384. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
  3. [74]74. Pavlov, I.P. 1927. Conditioned reflexes. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
  4. [93]93. Staddon, J E.R. 1988. Learning as inference. In Evolution and learning (eds. R.C. Bolles and M.D. Beecher), pp. 59-78. Erbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bouton, M. E.
Affiliations
University of Vermont (US)
Corresponding author
Bouton, Mark E.
Venue
Learning & Memory
Published
2004-09
Volume
11
Issue
5
Pages
485-494
ISSN
  • 1072-0502 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-5485
OpenAlex
W2145465887
Cited by
1,808
References
133
Citations by year
2026: 89 · 2025: 73 · 2024: 73 · 2023: 75 · 2022: 82 · 2021: 81 · 2020: 90 · 2019: 110 · 2018: 113 · 2017: 106 · 2016: 106 · 2015: 112 · 2014: 106 · 2013: 112 · 2012: 87
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Learning & Memory (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Cardiff University
  • National Institute of Mental Health (RO1 MH64847, R01MH064847, R01 MH64847)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
Pavlovian extinction, inhibitory learning, context-dependent learning, conditioned inhibition, interference paradigm, generalization decrement, response inhibition
MeSH terms
Animals, Association Learning, Conditioning, Classical, Cues, Discrimination Learning, Extinction, Psychological, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Psychological Theory, Reinforcement, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review