Cited by 24Spinal Cord Injury ResearchPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchTraumatic Brain Injury Research

Associations and Predictors of Posttraumatic Stress Levels According to Person-Related, Disability-Related, and Trauma-Related Variables Among Individuals With Spinal Cord Injuries.

Martz, Erin·2005·Rehabilitation Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0090-5550.50.2.149

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The association between pain and PTSD may be explained by the fact that pain might act as a constant reminder of the traumatic event.

    “this association may be explained by the fact that pain might act as a constant reminder of the traumatic event.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Martz, E.
Affiliations
University of Missouri (US)
Corresponding author
Martz, Erin
Venue
Rehabilitation Psychology
Published
2005-05
Volume
50
Issue
2
Pages
149-157
ISSN
  • 0090-5550 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1544
OpenAlex
W2030922843
Cited by
24
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Rehabilitation Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Spinal Cord Injury Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Keywords
post-traumatic stress, spinal cord injury, personal factors, psychological adjustment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review