The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On the ability to inhibit simple and choice reaction time responses: A model and a method.
Abstract
This article reports four experiments on the ability to inhibit responses in simple and choice reaction time (RT) tasks. Subjects responding to visually presented letters were occasionally presented with a stop signal (a tone) that told them not to respond on that trial. The major dependent variables were (a) the probability of inhibiting a response when the signal occurred, (b) mean and standard deviation (SD) of RT on no-signal trials, (c) mean RT on trials on which the signal occurred but subjects failed to inhibit, and (d) estimated RT to the stop signal. A model was proposed to estimated RT to the stop signal and to account for the relations among the variables. Its main assumption is that the RT process and the stopping process race, and response inhibition depends on which process finishes first. The model allows us to account for differences in response inhibition between tasks in terms of transformations of stop-signal delay that represent the relative finishing times of the RT process and the stopping process. The transformations specified by the model were successful in group data and in data from individual subjects, regardless of how delays were selected. The experiments also compared different methods of selecting stop-signal delays to equate the probability of inhibition in the two tasks.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Meanwhile, RI performance measured by the SST reflects the ability to cancel an already initiated motor response (Logan et al., 1984), which involves signal detection, proactive action control and action selection (Lerner et al., 2009; Verbruggen, McLaren, & Chambers, 2014; Verbruggen, Stevens, & Chambers, 2014).”
From Differences in response inhibition between medication-free patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder with and without sensory phenomena (2026) · cites this paper as Logan et al., 1984
Citations
Cites
Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences
Kirk, R. (2013) · doi:10.4135/9781483384733 · Cited by 8,539
On the ability to inhibit thought and action: a theory of an act of control
Logan, G. D., & Cowan, W. B. (1984) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.91.3.295 · Cited by 2,590
Self-citationPosner, M. I., & Boies, S. J. (1971) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0031333 · Cited by 1,751
THE ‘PSYCHOLOGICAL REFRACTORY PERIOD’ AND THE TIMING OF HIGH‐SPEED PERFORMANCE—A REVIEW AND A THEORY
Welford, A. T. (1952) · British Journal of Psychology General Section · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1952.tb00322.x · Cited by 950
Kantowitz, B. H. (2021) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003176688 · Cited by 562
Spelke, E. S., Hirst, W. C., & Neisser, U. (1976) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(76)90018-4 · Cited by 434
Use of a delayed signal to stop a visual reaction-time response.
Lappin, J. S., & Eriksen, C. W. (1966) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0021266 · Cited by 414
The psychological refractory period
Köster, W. (1966) · TU/e Research Portal · Cited by 188
On the ability to inhibit complex movements: A stop-signal study of typewriting.
Logan, G. D. (1982) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.8.6.778 · Cited by 149
Self-citationReliability, Accuracy, and Refractoriness of a Transit Reaction
Slater-Hammel, A. T. (1960) · Research Quarterly American Association for Health Physical Education and Recreation · doi:10.1080/10671188.1960.10613098 · Cited by 110
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Neural Basis of Decision Making
Gold, J. I., & Shadlen, M. N. (2007) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.29.051605.113038 · Cited by 3,764
The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning
Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x01000103 · Cited by 3,194
Executive functions and developmental psychopathology.
Pennington, B. F., & Ozonoff, S. (1996) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.1996.tb01380.x · Cited by 3,150
On the ability to inhibit thought and action: a theory of an act of control
Logan, G. D., & Cowan, W. B. (1984) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.91.3.295 · Cited by 2,590
Self-citationInfluence of cognitive control and mismatch on the N2 component of the ERP: A review
Folstein, J. R., & Van Petten, C. (2008) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00602.x · Cited by 2,567
Metadata
- Authors
- Logan, G. D., Cowan, W. B., & Davis, K. A.
- Affiliations
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- ORCID
- Logan, Gordon D.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
- Published
- 1984
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 276-291
- ISSN
- 0096-1523 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1277
- OpenAlex
- W2094955630
- Cited by
- 1,542
- References
- 15
- Citations by year
- 2026: 41 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 69 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 106 · 2020: 117 · 2019: 67 · 2018: 83 · 2017: 64 · 2016: 74 · 2015: 88 · 2014: 89 · 2013: 78 · 2012: 84
- FWCI
- 1.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- NPARC (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Keywords
- response inhibition, stop-signal task, choice reaction time, simple reaction time, stop-signal delay, race model, reaction time variability, individual differences
- MeSH terms
- Choice Behavior, Cues, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Models, Psychological, Probability, Reaction Time
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
