The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An audiovisual test of kinematic primitives for visual speech perception.
Abstract
Isolated kinematic properties of visible speech can provide information for lip reading. Kinematic facial information is isolated by darkening an actor's face and attaching dots to various articulators so that only moving dots can be seen with no facial features present. To test the salience of these images, the authors conducted experiments to determine whether the images could visually influence the perception of discrepant auditory syllables. Results showed that these images can influence auditory speech independently of the participant's knowledge of the stimuli. In other experiments, single frozen frames of visible syllables were presented with discrepant auditory syllables to test the salience of static facial features. Although the influence of the kinematic stimuli was perceptual, any influence of the static featural stimuli was likely based on participant's misunderstanding or postperceptual response bias.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“images that involve no identifiable facial features but that comprise only a few illuminated dots on a darkened face can also influence heard speech”
From The McGurk effect in infants (1997) · cites this paper as Rosenblum & Saldana, 1996
In the citing paper
“The latter study also revealed that visual influences can occur for observers who do not recognize the images as a face.”
From The McGurk effect in infants (1997) · cites this paper as Rosenblum & Saldana, 1996
Citations
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–116 of 116
Primacy of Multimodal Speech Perception for the Brain and Science
Rosenblum, L. D., & Dorsi, J. (2021) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119184096.ch2 · Cited by 6
Self-citationVisual and Cognitive Predictors of Visual Enhancement in Noisy Listening Conditions
Jansen, S. D., Chaparro, A., Downs, D. W., et al. (2013) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/1541931213571267 · Cited by 4
Audiovisual Speech Web-Lab: An Internet teaching and research laboratory
Gordon, M. S., & Rosenblum, L. D. (2001) · Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers · doi:10.3758/bf03195374 · Cited by 3
Self-citationSalagovic, C. A., Stevenson, R. A., & Butler, B. E. (2024) · Ear and Hearing · doi:10.1097/aud.0000000000001607 · Cited by 4
Energy, information, detection, and action
Michaels, C. F., & Oudejans, R. R. D. (2001) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x01403943 · Cited by 2
Tracking Facial Markers with an Adaptive Marker Collocation Model
Barker, J. (2006) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp.2005.1415492 · Cited by 2
Weaker McGurk Effect for Rubin’s Vase-Type Speech in People With High Autistic Traits
Ujiie, Y., & Takahashi, K. (2021) · Multisensory Research · doi:10.1163/22134808-bja10047 · Cited by 2
Hearing Lips and Seeing Voices: Illusion and Serendipity in Auditory‐Visual Perception Research
Macdonald, J. B. (2006) · doi:10.1002/9780470777930.ch6 · Cited by 1
Direct perception of global invariants is not a fruitful notion
Peper, C. E., & Beek, P. J. (2001) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x01453945 · Cited by 1
Salagovic, C. A., Stevenson, R. A., & Butler, B. E. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/982kh · Cited by 1
Watson, D. M., & Johnston, A. (2021) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/eucsf
The Role of Multisensory Temporal Covariation in Audiovisual Speech Recognition in NoisePreprint
Venezia, J. H., Sandlin, R. E., Wojno, L., et al. (2019) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/gcxwp
Evidence for a Generic Process Underlying Multisensory Integration
Tremblay, C., Champoux, F., Bacon, B. A., et al. (2007) · The Open Behavioral Science Journal · doi:10.2174/187423000701011000
Learning to recognize unfamiliar faces from fine-phonetic detail in visual speech
Jesse, A. (2025) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-025-03049-y
Salagovic, C. A., Stevenson, R. A., & Butler, B. E. (2025) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2025_jslhr-24-00890
Lewkowicz, D. J., & McClellan, J. (2026) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0354673
Metadata
- Authors
- Rosenblum, L. D., & Saldaña, H. M.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Riverside (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
- Published
- 1996
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 318-331
- ISSN
- 0096-1523 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1277
- OpenAlex
- W2093772147
- Cited by
- 204
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 8.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
- Keywords
- lip reading, visible speech, articulator movement, moving dots, audiovisual speech perception, audiovisual integration
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Attention, Facial Expression, Female, Humans, Lipreading, Male, Phonetics, Psychoacoustics, Speech Perception, Video Recording
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
