The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Correspondence effects with manual gestures and postures: a study of imitation
Abstract
In this study, the authors applied methods and theories from research of stimulus-response compatibility (SRC) to action imitation. In 6 experiments, they adopted the logic of the Simon paradigm (B. Hommel & W. Prinz, 1996) to explore interference between task-relevant symbolic stimulus features (color) and task-irrelevant iconic stimulus features (2 hand gestures and 2 postures). The same 2 hand gestures served as responses. Pronounced correspondence effects for both gestures and postures showed up throughout. In line with theories of SRC, the authors account for these correspondence effects in terms of overlap arising between stimulus and response features in a common representational domain. As a specific extension of this approach, they propose 2 functionally independent mechanisms: One operates movement-based when dynamic information is provided, and the other operates state-based with static postures as stimuli. Implications for theories of both SRC and action imitation are discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“As would be expected from the SRC literature using symbolic stimuli, reaction times are faster for imitative responses (which by definition share many properties with the action stimulus) than for non-imitative responses (Brass et al., 2000; Stürmer et al., 2000).”
From To imitate or not: Avoiding imitation involves preparatory inhibition of motor resonance (2014) · cites this paper as Stürmer et al., 2000
In the citing paper
“Imitation—the copying of others actions—is a form of SRC involving human actions, where responses are stimulus-compatible with respect to spatial and kinetic features (Brass et al., 2000; Stürmer et al., 2000).”
From To imitate or not: Avoiding imitation involves preparatory inhibition of motor resonance (2014) · cites this paper as Stürmer et al., 2000
Citations
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Case for Motor Involvement in Perceiving Conspecifics.
Wilson, M., & Knoblich, G. (2005) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.3.460 · Cited by 846
Brass, M., Bekkering, H., Wohlschläger, A., & Prinz, W. (2000) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1006/brcg.2000.1225 · Cited by 791
Self-citationMovement observation affects movement execution in a simple response task.
Brass, M., Bekkering, H., & Prinz, W. (2001) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/s0001-6918(00)00024-x · Cited by 791
Self-citationThe motor theory of speech perception reviewed
Galantucci, B., Fowler, C. A., & Turvey, M. T. (2006) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03193857 · Cited by 720
Mirror neurons: from origin to function
Cook, R., Bird, G., Catmur, C., Press, C., & Heyes, C. (2014) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x13000903 · Cited by 647
Metadata
- Authors
- Stürmer, B., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W.
- Affiliations
- Max Planck Society (DE)
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
- Published
- 2000
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1746-1759
- ISSN
- 0096-1523 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1277
- OpenAlex
- W2008837112
- Cited by
- 300
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
- Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- stimulus-response compatibility, action imitation, hand gestures, posture, symbolic features, feature overlap
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Generalization, Stimulus, Gestures, Hand, Humans, Imitative Behavior, Male, Middle Aged, Perception, Posture
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
