The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Once more: Is beauty in the eye of the beholder? Relative contributions of private and shared taste to judgments of facial attractiveness.
Abstract
Misconstruing the meaning of Cronbach's alpha, experts on facial attractiveness have conveyed the impression that facial-attractiveness judgment standards are largely shared. This claim is unsubstantiated, because information necessary for deciding whether judgments of facial attractiveness are more influenced by commonly shared or by privately held evaluation standards is lacking. Three experiments, using diverse face and rater samples to investigate the relative contributions of private and shared taste to judgments of facial attractiveness, are reported. These experiments show that for a variety of ancillary conditions, and contrary to the prevalent notion in the literature, private taste is about as powerful as shared taste. Important implications for scientific research strategy and laypeople's self-esteem are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications
Cortina, J. M. (1993) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.98 · Cited by 8,810 · cited 3×
“…is the sum of all elements in the variance–covariance matrix (this computation being based on the assumption that all judges’ variances are equal; Cortina, 1993). rated: Such hypotheses have had a beneficial effect on facialattractiveness research by providing theoretical guidelines (e.g.,…”
BackgroundInfluentialSex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures
Buss, D. M. (1989) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00023992 · Cited by 4,484
Dion, K., Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1972) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0033731 · Cited by 3,865
Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review
Langlois, J. H., Kalakanis, L., Rubenstein, A. J., Larson, A., Hallam, M., & Smoot, M. (2000) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.126.3.390 · Cited by 2,429 · cited 3×
“, Alicke, Smith, & Klotz, 1986; Furnham, Lavancy, & McClelland, 2001), and physical attractiveness matters: Physically attractive children and adults of both sexes are more favorably judged and treated by others than are their less attractive peers (Eagly, Ashmore, Makhijani, & Longo, 1991; Feingold, 1992; Langlois et…”
BackgroundEagly, A. H., Ashmore, R. D., Makhijani, M. G., & Longo, L. C. (1991) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.110.1.109 · Cited by 1,875
Probabilistic mental models: a Brunswikian theory of confidence
Gigerenzer, G., Hoffrage, U., & Kleinbölting, H. (1991) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.98.4.506 · Cited by 1,506
Grammer, K., & Thornhill, R. (1994) · Journal of Comparative Psychology · doi:10.1037/0735-7036.108.3.233 · Cited by 1,110
Cited by
Westfall, J., Kenny, D. A., & Judd, C. M. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/xge0000014 · Cited by 928
Experiments with More Than One Random Factor: Designs, Analytic Models, and Statistical Power
Judd, C. M., Westfall, J., & Kenny, D. A. (2017) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033702 · Cited by 466
Evaluating face trustworthiness: a model based approach
Todorov, A., Baron, S. G., & Oosterhof, N. N. (2008) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsn009 · Cited by 426
Todorov, A. (2008) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1196/annals.1440.012 · Cited by 382
Mapping aesthetic musical emotions in the brain
Trost, W., Ethofer, T., Zentner, M., & Vuilleumier, P. (2012) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhr353 · Cited by 326
Metadata
- Authors
- Hönekopp, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
- Published
- 2006
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 199-209
- ISSN
- 0096-1523 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1277
- OpenAlex
- W2123821616
- Cited by
- 290
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 10.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Once more: Is beauty in the eye of the beholder? Relative contributions of private and shared taste to judgments of facial attractiveness. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/0096-1523.32.2.199
- The paper
- Hönekopp, J. (2006). Once more: Is beauty in the eye of the beholder? Relative contributions of private and shared taste to judgments of facial attractiveness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.32.2.199
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
