Cited by 1,506Memory Processes and InfluencesDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Probabilistic mental models: a Brunswikian theory of confidence

Open access
Gigerenzer, Gerd, Hoffrage, Ulrich, Kleinbölting, Heinz·1991·Psychological Review

Abstract

Research on people's confidence in their general knowledge has to date produced two fairly stable effects, many inconsistent results, and no comprehensive theory. We propose such a comprehensive framework, the theory of probabilistic mental models (PMM theory). The theory (a) explains both the overconfidence effect (mean confidence is higher than percentage of answers correct) and the hard-easy effect (overconfidence increases with item difficulty) reported in the literature and (b) predicts conditions under which both effects appear, disappear, or invert. In addition, (c) it predicts a new phenomenon, the confidence-frequency effect, a systematic difference between a judgment of confidence in a single event (i.e., that any given answer is correct) and a judgment of the frequency of correct answers in the long run. Two experiments are reported that support PMM theory by confirming these predictions, and several apparent anomalies reported in the literature are explained and integrated into the present framework.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0033-295x.98.4.506

Cites

83 of 83 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gigerenzer, G., Hoffrage, U., & Kleinbölting, H.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Venue
Psychological Review
Published
1991
Volume
98
Issue
4
Pages
506-528
ISSN
  • 0033-295X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1471
OpenAlex
W2150234857
Cited by
1,506
References
83
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 65 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 51 · 2016: 50 · 2015: 52 · 2014: 51 · 2013: 49 · 2012: 76
FWCI
8.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Psychological Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  • Center for Advanced Study, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
confidence judgments, overconfidence, metacognition, general knowledge, item difficulty
MeSH terms
Adult, Humans, Judgment, Probability Theory, Self Concept

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review