Cited by 137Motor Control and AdaptationVisual perception and processing mechanismsAction Observation and Synchronization

Hand path priming in manual obstacle avoidance: Evidence that the dorsal stream does not only control visually guided actions in real time.

Jax, Steven A., Rosenbaum, David A.·2007·Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Abstract

According to a prominent theory of human perception and performance (M. A. Goodale & A. D. Milner, 1992), the dorsal, action-related stream only controls visually guided actions in real time. Such a system would be predicted to show little or no action priming from previous experience. The 3 experiments reported here were designed to determine whether priming exists for visually guiding the hand to targets with obstacles sometimes in the way. In all 3 experiments, priming was observed in the curvature of hand paths. Hand paths when no obstacles were present were more curved if obstacles had recently appeared than if obstacles had not recently appeared. The results also show that hand path priming was not the result of active prediction, persisted for many trials, and generalized over the workspace. The times to initiate movements also reflected the use of a sophisticated visual search strategy that took obstacle likelihood into account.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0096-1523.33.2.425

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The resulting priors might be the basis of hand-path priming effects.

    “The resulting priors might be the basis of hand-path priming effects, in which hand movements around obstacles induce a significant curvature in the trajectory of the movement trajectories that persists after the obstacle has been removed (Jax and Rosenbaum 2007).”

    From Action and behavior: a free-energy formulation (2010) · cites this paper as Jax and Rosenbaum 2007

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 39 · Cited by 137

Authors
Jax, S. A., & Rosenbaum, D. A.
Affiliations
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Venue
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
Published
2007
Volume
33
Issue
2
Pages
425-441
ISSN
  • 0096-1523 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1277
OpenAlex
W2061185641
Cited by
137
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (F31 NS 047784-01)
  • National Science Foundation (SBR-94-96290)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (KO2-MH0097701A1; R15 NS41887-01)
  • Pennsylvania State University
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
Keywords
dorsal stream, action priming, visuomotor control, visual search strategies
MeSH terms
Hand, Humans, Movement, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Time Factors, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review