Bending the power law: A CMPL theory of strategy shifts and the automatization of cognitive skills.
Abstract
The shift with practice from use of generic, multistep problem-solving strategies to fast and relatively effortless memory-based strategies, was explored in 2 experiments using pseudoarithmetic tasks. A complete transition to the memory strategy occurred by about the 60th exposure to each problem. The power law of practice did not hold in the overall data for either the mean or the standard deviation of response latency, but it did hold within each strategy (algorithm or retrieval). Learning was highly specific to the practiced problems. These results constitute the 1st clear demonstration of a skill for which the power law does not apply overall. The results do not support the instance theory of automatization (G. D. Logan, 1988) but are consistent with an alternative component 12ower laws (CMPL) theory that assumes that because of intrinsic attentional limitations, only 1 strategy can be executed at a time. One of the fundamental processes of human skill acquisition is the strategy shift with practice from use of generic, multistep procedures to direct retrieval of answers from
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
CMPL theory hypothesizes a two-stage model based on the transition from algorithmic processing to memory retrieval.
“This is where CMPL theory differs from the race model by hypothesizing a two-stage model based on the transition between two different mechanisms.”
From Testing the three-stage model of second language skill acquisition (2025) · cites this paper as Rickard, 1997
Competing theoretical models of L2 skill acquisition with fewer stages exist.
“yet competing theoretical models with fewer stages also exist”
From Testing the three-stage model of second language skill acquisition (2025) · cites this paper as Rickard, 1997
Cites
A THEORY OF THE ACQUISITION OF SPEED-SKILL∗
CROSSMAN, E. R. F. W. (1959) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140135908930419 · Cited by 517 · see citing works
The problems of flexibility, fluency, and speed-accuracy trade-off in skilled behavior
MacKay, D. G. (1982) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.89.5.483 · Cited by 490 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A neurobiological theory of automaticity in perceptual categorization
Ashby, F. G., Ennis, J. M., & Spiering, B. J. (2007) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.114.3.632 · Cited by 286 · see citing works
Testing the three-stage model of second language skill acquisition
Maie, R., & Godfroid, A. (2025) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s027226312500021x · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“The CMPL theory (Rickard, 1997; for a recent review, see Bajic & Rickard, 2011) similarly posits instance learning as the underlying mechanism.”
- Authors
- Rickard, T. C.
- Affiliations
- University of California San Diego (US)
- Corresponding author
- Rickard, Timothy C.
- ORCID
- Rickard, Timothy C.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
- Published
- 1997-09
- Volume
- 126
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 288-311
- ISSN
- 0096-3445 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2222
- OpenAlex
- W1977919377
- Cited by
- 231
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 6.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Psychology General (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Keywords
- strategy switching, power law of practice, algorithmic problem solving, response latency, attentional limitations, skill acquisition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review