Cited by 490Motor Control and AdaptationSport Psychology and PerformanceNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

The problems of flexibility, fluency, and speed-accuracy trade-off in skilled behavior

MacKay, Donald G.·1982·Psychological Review

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0033-295x.89.5.483

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
MacKay, D. G.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
MacKay, Donald G.
Venue
Psychological Review
Published
1982-09
Volume
89
Issue
5
Pages
483-506
ISSN
  • 0033-295X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1471
OpenAlex
W1998688911
Cited by
490
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 14
FWCI
5.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychological Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
flexibility, fluency, speed-accuracy trade-off, motor learning, motor control

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review