Cited by 74Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Correlates of functional disability in patients with postural tachycardia syndrome: preliminary cross-sectional findings

Benrud-Larson, Lisa M., Sandroni, Paola, Haythornthwaite, Jennifer A., Rummans, Teresa A., Low, Phillip A.·2003·Health Psychology

Abstract

The study investigated correlates of functional disability in 94 patients (89.4% women, 10.6% men; mean age=34.2 years) with postural tachycardia syndrome (POTS), a clinical syndrome of orthostatic intolerance characterized by significant functional limitations. Path analysis supported a model in which, controlling for demographic and disease variables, catastrophic cognitions were directly related to the latent variable functional disability, whereas somatic vigilance, anxiety sensitivity, and neuroticism were indirectly associated with functional disability through their relationship with catastrophic cognitions. Results suggest that modifiable psychological factors play a role in the functional limitations experienced by patients with POTS. Longitudinal research is necessary to confirm these relationships.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0278-6133.22.6.643

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 31 · Cited by 74

Authors
Benrud-Larson, L. M., Sandroni, P., Haythornthwaite, J. A., Rummans, T. A., & Low, P. A.
Affiliations
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Venue
Health Psychology
Published
2003
Volume
22
Issue
6
Pages
643-648
ISSN
  • 0278-6133 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-7810
OpenAlex
W2025753119
Cited by
74
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS3 2352, NS 02225, K24NS002225)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD 07447)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome, functional disability, catastrophic cognitions, anxiety sensitivity, neuroticism, orthostatic intolerance, psychological factors, path analysis
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Disability Evaluation, Female, Humans, Hypotension, Orthostatic, Male, Minnesota, Models, Psychological, Neuropsychological Tests, Posture, Somatoform Disorders, Tachycardia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review