CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 590Diabetes Management and EducationMotivation and Self-Concept in SportsBehavioral Health and Interventions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Testing a Self-Determination Theory Process Model for Promoting Glycemic Control Through Diabetes Self-Management.

Williams, Geoffrey C., McGregor, Holly A., Zeldman, Allan, Freedman, Zachary R., Deci, Edward L.·2004·Health Psychology
DOI 10.1037/0278-6133.23.1.58
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

A longitudinal study tested the self-determination theory (SDT) process model of health behavior change for glycemic control within a randomized trial of patient activation versus passive education. Glycosylated hemoglobin for patients with Type 2 diabetes (n=159) was assessed at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. Autonomous motivation and perceived competence were assessed at baseline and 6 months, and the autonomy supportiveness of clinical practitioners was assessed at 3 months. Perceptions of autonomy and competence were promoted by perceived autonomy support, and changes in perceptions of autonomy and competence, in turn, predicted change in glycemic control. Self-management behaviors mediated the relation between change in perceived competence and change in glycemic control. The self-determination process model fit the data well.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0278-6133.23.1.58

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Muller, 1999, Intensified treatment and education of Type 1 diabetes as clinical routine., Diabetes Care, 22, B29
  2. 10.1037/0022-3514.70.4.767 · DOI
  3. Williams, 1998, Building Healthcare partnerships by supporting autonomy: Promoting maintained behavior change and positive health outcomes., 67

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 590

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Williams, G. C., McGregor, H. A., Zeldman, A., Freedman, Z. R., & Deci, E. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Rochester Medicine (US)
  • University of Rochester (US)
  • Rochester General Hospital (US)
ORCID
Venue
Health Psychology
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
Published
2004
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
58-66
ISSN
  • 0278-6133 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-7810
DOI
10.1037/0278-6133.23.1.58
OpenAlex
W2088029025
Cited by
590
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 34
FWCI
11.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01dk050807-04)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (1-R01-DK-50807)
  • National Center for Research Resources (5-M01-RR-00044, M01RR000044)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
self-determination theory, process model, glycemic control, type 2 diabetes, diabetes self-management, patient activation, autonomous motivation, perceived competence, autonomy support, HbA1c, health behavior change, self-management behavior
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Demography, Diabetes Mellitus, Female, Humans, Hyperglycemia, Hypoglycemia, Male, Middle Aged, Psychological Theory, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Care, Health Behavior, Personal Autonomy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review