Cited by 360Psychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsOptimism, Hope, and Well-being

Misimagining the unimaginable: The disability paradox and health care decision making.

Ubel, Peter A., Loewenstein, George, Schwarz, Norbert, Smith, Dylan·2005·Health Psychology

Abstract

Good decision making often requires accurate predictions about how potential outcomes will make one feel. However, people often mispredict the emotional impact of unfamiliar circumstances. For example, they often overestimate the emotional impact that chronic illnesses and disability will have on their lives. In the present article, the authors look at possible sources of error in both the happiness reports of patients with chronic illness or disability and the happiness predictions of healthy people asked to imagine the same illnesses and disabilities. On balance, the available evidence suggests that, whereas patients misreport their well-being, healthy people also mispredict the emotional impact that chronic illness and disability will have on their lives.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0278-6133.24.4.s57

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • People experiencing a wide range of illnesses and disabilities often report paradoxically high levels of quality of life and mood.

    “People experiencing a wide range of illnesses and disabilities often report paradoxically high levels of [quality of life] and mood”

    From Neurodiversity, epistemic injustice, and the good human life (2022) · cites this paper as Ubel et al., 2005

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 26 · Cited by 360

Authors
Ubel, P. A., Loewenstein, G., Schwarz, N., & Smith, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Venue
Health Psychology
Published
2005
Volume
24
Issue
4, Suppl
Pages
S57-S62
ISSN
  • 0278-6133 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-7810
OpenAlex
W1981436378
Cited by
360
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 19
FWCI
16.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
Keywords
disability paradox, healthcare decision-making, emotional impact of illness, chronic disease, disability, patient-reported outcomes, health-related quality of life
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Chronic Disease, Decision Making, Delivery of Health Care, Persons with Disabilities, Humans, Imagination, Patient Participation, Quality of Life, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review