CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 176Cancer survivorship and careAttachment and Relationship DynamicsFamily Support in Illness

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Partner unsupportive responses, avoidant coping, and distress among women with early stage breast cancer: Patient and partner perspectives.

Manne, Sharon L., Ostroff, Jamie, Winkel, Gary, Grana, Generosa, Fox, Kevin·2005·Health Psychology
DOI 10.1037/0278-6133.24.6.635
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This 18-month longitudinal study examined the associations among partner unsupportive behavior, avoidant coping, and distress experienced by 219 women with early stage breast cancer. The role of patient and partner ratings of unsupportive behavior were evaluated. Results indicated that patient and partner ratings of unsupportive behavior were highly correlated. Growth curve modeling suggested that unsupportive behavior, from both patient and partner perspectives, predicted more avoidant coping and distress. When partner and patient perceptions were placed in the same model, patient perceptions mediated the association between partners' ratings of their unsupportive behavior and patient distress. Avoidance also mediated the association between unsupportive behavior and distress, extending prior cross-sectional findings. Results highlight the long-term detrimental effects of partners' unsupportive behavior on the quality of life of women with early stage breast cancer.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0278-6133.24.6.635

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. 1996, SAS Institute's rapid warehousing methodology (Manual).
  2. Schag, 1988, Cancer rehabilitation and evaluation system manual.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 176

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Manne, S. L., Ostroff, J., Winkel, G., Grana, G., & Fox, K.
Affiliations
  • Fox Chase Cancer Center (US)
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
  • The Graduate Center, CUNY (US)
  • Cooper University Hospital (US)
  • Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania (US)
ORCID
Venue
Health Psychology
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
Published
2005
Volume
24
Issue
6
Pages
635-641
ISSN
  • 0278-6133 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-7810
DOI
10.1037/0278-6133.24.6.635
OpenAlex
W2086006547
Cited by
176
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 12
FWCI
3.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (R01 CA78084, R01CA078084)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family Support in Illness
Keywords
early breast cancer, avoidance coping, psychological distress, spousal support, mediation, quality of life, women with cancer
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Breast Neoplasms, Cooperative Behavior, Depression, Escape Reaction, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Sexual Partners, Social Support

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review