The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Talking facilitates cognitive–emotional processes of adaptation to an acute stressor
Abstract
The authors examined the influence of talking and the social context of talking on cognitive-emotional processes of adjustment to stressors. Two hundred fifty-six undergraduates viewed a stressful stimulus and were then assigned to a no-talk control condition or 1 of 3 talk conditions: talk alone, talk to a validating confederate, or talk to an invalidating confederate. Two days later, they were reexposed to the stressor. Compared with individuals in the no-talk condition, those in the talk alone and validate conditions had a lower level of intrusive thoughts in the 2-day interim, and they had lower perceived stress when reexposed to the stressor. The effects of talking and validation on perceived stress appeared to be mediated by lowered intrusions. The benefits of talking were diluted when disclosures were invalidated. These findings suggest that talking about acute stressors can facilitate adjustment to stressors through cognitive resolution.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Forming a narrative of the situation facilitates new insights and eliminates rumination over what was previously confusing or bothersome (Lepore, Ragan, & Jones, 2000; Pennebaker & Chung, 2007).”
From Psychological, Relational, and Emotional Effects of Self-Disclosure After Conversations With a Chatbot (2018) · cites this paper as Lepore, Ragan, & Jones, 2000
Citations
Cites
Origins of ruminative thought: Trauma, incompleteness, nondisclosure, and suppression
Gold, D. B., & Wegner, D. M. (1995) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1995.tb02617.x · Cited by 202
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Emotion Elicits the Social Sharing of Emotion: Theory and Empirical Review
Rimé, B. (2009) · Emotion Review · doi:10.1177/1754073908097189 · Cited by 1,546
Hagedoorn, M., Sanderman, R., Bolks, H. N., Tuinstra, J., & Coyne, J. C. (2008) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.1.1 · Cited by 777
Ho, A., Hancock, J., & Miner, A. S. (2018) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1093/joc/jqy026 · Cited by 629
“Forming a narrative of the situation facilitates new insights and eliminates rumination over what was previously confusing or bothersome (Lepore, Ragan, & Jones, 2000; Pennebaker & Chung, 2007).”
BackgroundA self‐determination theory approach to understanding stress incursion and responses
Weinstein, N., & Ryan, R. M. (2011) · Stress and Health · doi:10.1002/smi.1368 · Cited by 342
Scott, J. L., Halford, W. K., & Ward, B. G. (2004) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.72.6.1122 · Cited by 324
Metadata
- Authors
- Lepore, S. J., Ragan, J. D., & Jones, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 2000
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 499-508
- ISSN
- 1939-1315
- 0022-3514
- Cited by
- 245
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review