Cited by 187Behavioral Health and InterventionsMedia Influence and HealthHealth and Wellbeing Research

Self-affirmation promotes health behavior change.

Open access
Epton, Tracy, Harris, Peter R.·2008·Health Psychology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Evidence shows that self-affirmation has a positive effect on message acceptance and other variables that motivate health behavior change; however, this has not been translated into actual behavioral change. We propose that particular features of the previous studies may account for this failure; the current study addresses this. It is designed to test whether a self-affirmation manipulation can increase a health-promoting behavior (fruit and vegetable consumption). It also explores the extent to which efficacy variables mediate the self-affirmation and behavior relationship. DESIGN: Women (N = 93) were randomly allocated to a self-affirmation or control task prior to reading a message regarding the health-promoting effects of fruit and vegetables. MAIN OUTCOME-MEASURES: Response-efficacy, self-efficacy, and intention measures were taken immediately after exposure to the message, followed by a 7-day diary record of fruit and vegetable consumption. RESULTS: Self-affirmed participants ate significantly more portions of fruit and vegetables, an increase of approximately 5.5 portions across the week, in comparison to the control group. This effect was mediated by response-efficacy. CONCLUSION: Self-affirmation interventions can successfully influence health-promoting behaviors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0278-6133.27.6.746

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When self-affirmed, participants ate more portions of fruits and vegetables over the following week, as assessed by a validated daily diary instrument.

    “When self-affirmed, participants ate more portions of fruits and vegetables over the following week, as assessed by a validated daily diary instrument.”

    From The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention (2014) · cites this paper as Epton & Harris 2008

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 31 · Cited by 187

Authors
Epton, T., & Harris, P. R.
Affiliations
University of Sheffield (GB)
Venue
Health Psychology
Published
2008
Volume
27
Issue
6
Pages
746-752
ISSN
  • 0278-6133 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-7810
OpenAlex
W2047840374
Cited by
187
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 11
FWCI
13.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Health Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Wellbeing Research
Keywords
self-affirmation, health behavior change, fruit and vegetable intake, response efficacy, self-efficacy, behavioral intention, health messaging, women
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Diet, Female, Health Promotion, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Health Behavior, Self Efficacy, Intention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review