This is like that: The use of earlier problems and the separation of similarity effects.
Abstract
Novices attempting to solve a problem often are reminded of an earlier problem that illustrated a principle. Two experiments examined how these earlier problems are used and how this use is related to these remindings. Subjects studied four probability principles with related word problems. Test problems varied in their similarity to the study problems on story lines, objects, and correspondence of objects (variable roles). Experiment 1 tested whether remindings cue the principle or serve as the sources of detailed analogies. When the appropriate formula was provided with each test, the similarity of story lines had no effect, but object correspondences had a large effect. These results support an analogical account in which mapping is affected by the similarity of objects between study and test problems. Experiment 2 began to separate the aspects of similarity affecting the access and use of earlier problems by showing that, with confusable principles, similar story lines increased the access, but did not affect the use. The access appears to be sensitive to the relative similarity of examples because with distinctive principles, similar story lines had little effect. Discussion focuses on the further specification of the processes of noticing and analogical use of earlier problems.
Cites (25)
- Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices*Chi, Michelene T. H., Feltovich, Paul J., Glaser, Robert · 1981 · Cognitive Science
- Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as DataVenkatesan, M., Ericsson, K. Anders, Simon, Herbert A. · 1986 · Journal of Marketing Research
- Context theory of classification learningMedin, Douglas L., Schaffer, Marguerite M. · 1978 · Psychological Review
- Schema induction and analogical transferGick, Mary L., Holyoak, Keith J. · 1983 · Cognitive Psychology
- Untitled work2013 · Springer eBooks
- Analogical problem solvingGick, Mary L., Holyoak, Keith J. · 1980 · Cognitive Psychology
- Advances in the Psychology of Human Intelligence2014 · Psychology Press eBooks
- Expertise in Problem Solving.T. H. Michelene, Robert A. Glaser, Ernest T. Rees · 1981 · Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC)
- Cognitive Processes in Comprehension2013 · Psychology Press eBooks
- Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogyGENTNER, D · 1983 · Cognitive Science
Cited by (40)
- When and where do we apply what we learn?: A taxonomy for far transferBarnett, Susan M., Ceci, Stephen J. · 2002 · Psychological Bulletin
- Policy Implementation and Cognition: Reframing and Refocusing Implementation ResearchSpillane, James P, Reiser, Brian J, Reimer, Todd · 2002 · Review of Educational Research
- Organizational behavior and human decision processesArmstrong, J.Scott · 1988 · International Journal of Forecasting
- The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction.Chinn, Clark A., Brewer, William F. · 1993 · Review of Educational Research
- Implicit memory: Retention without remembering.Roediger, Henry L. · 1990 · American Psychologist
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: This is like that: The use of earlier problems and the separation of similarity effects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0278-7393.13.4.629
- The paper
- Ross, B. H. (1987). This is like that: The use of earlier problems and the separation of similarity effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.13.4.629
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.