The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Aware and (Dis)Liking: Item-Based Analyses Reveal That Valence Acquisition via Evaluative Conditioning Emerges Only When There Is Contingency Awareness.
Abstract
Evaluative conditioning (EC) refers to changes in the liking of an affectively neutral stimulus (the conditioned stimulus, or CS) following the pairing of that stimulus with another stimulus of affective value (the unconditioned stimulus, or US). In 3 experiments, the authors assessed contingency awareness, that is, awareness of the CS-US associations, by relying on participants' responses to individual items rather than using a global method of assessment. They found that EC emerged on contingency aware CSs only. Of note, whether the CSs were evaluated explicitly (Experiments 1 and 2) or implicitly (Experiment 3) did not make a difference. This pattern supports the idea that awareness of the CS-US associations may be required for valence acquisition via EC.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A theory of attention: Variations in the associability of stimuli with reinforcement
Mackintosh, N. J. (1975) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0076778 · Cited by 2,733
De Houwer, J., Thomas, S., & Baeyens, F. (2001) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.127.6.853 · Cited by 1,181
Characteristics of dissociable human learning systems
Shanks, D. R., & St. John, M. F. (1994) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00035032 · Cited by 1,163
The somatic marker hypothesis: A critical evaluation
Dunn, B. D., Dalgleish, T., & Lawrence, A. D. (2006) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.07.001 · Cited by 894
Cited by
Goals, Attention, and (Un)Consciousness
Dijksterhuis, A., & Aarts, H. (2010) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100445 · Cited by 527
Wiers, R. W., Gladwin, T. E., Hofmann, W., Salemink, E., & Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2013) · Clinical Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/2167702612466547 · Cited by 486
The Associative–Propositional Evaluation Model
Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2011) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-385522-0.00002-0 · Cited by 426
De Houwer, J. (2009) · Learning & Behavior · doi:10.3758/lb.37.1.1 · Cited by 362
Two dimensions of interpersonal attitudes: Liking depends on communion, respect depends on agency
Wojciszke, B., Abele, A. E., & Baryla, W. (2009) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.595 · Cited by 289
Metadata
- Authors
- Pleyers, G., Corneille, O., Luminet, O., & Yzerbyt, V.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
- Published
- 2007
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 130-144
- ISSN
- 0278-7393 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1285
- OpenAlex
- W2122222822
- Cited by
- 209
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 7.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Funders
- Action de Recherche Concertée (ARC06/11-337)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Aware and (Dis)Liking: Item-Based Analyses Reveal That Valence Acquisition via Evaluative Conditioning Emerges Only When There Is Contingency Awareness. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/0278-7393.33.1.130
- The paper
- Pleyers, G., Corneille, O., Luminet, O., & Yzerbyt, V. (2007). Aware and (Dis)Liking: Item-Based Analyses Reveal That Valence Acquisition via Evaluative Conditioning Emerges Only When There Is Contingency Awareness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.33.1.130
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
