The DOI matches its Crossref record; 208 of the 208 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The cocktail party problem: What is it? How can it be solved? And why should animal behaviorists study it?
Open accessAbstract
Animals often use acoustic signals to communicate in groups or social aggregations in which multiple individuals signal within a receiver's hearing range. Consequently, receivers face challenges related to acoustic interference and auditory masking that are not unlike the human cocktail party problem, which refers to the problem of perceiving speech in noisy social settings. Understanding the sensory solutions to the cocktail party problem has been a goal of research on human hearing and speech communication for several decades. Despite a general interest in acoustic signaling in groups, animal behaviorists have devoted comparatively less attention toward understanding how animals solve problems equivalent to the human cocktail party problem. After illustrating how humans and nonhuman animals experience and overcome similar perceptual challenges in cocktail-party-like social environments, this article reviews previous psychophysical and physiological studies of humans and nonhuman animals to describe how the cocktail party problem can be solved. This review also outlines several basic and applied benefits that could result from studies of the cocktail party problem in the context of animal acoustic communication.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“real ecosystems are messy “cocktail-party” environments (Bee and Micheyl 2008), full of overlapping calls, echoes, and background noise.”
From Listening forward: emerging roles of bioacoustics in ecology, evolution, and conservation (2026) · cites this paper as Bee and Micheyl 2008
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Some Experiments on the Recognition of Speech, with One and with Two Ears
Cherry, E. C. (1953) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1907229 · Cited by 4,774
On aims and methods of ethology
Tinbergen, N. (1963) · Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie · doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.1963.tb01161.x · Cited by 4,551
Auditory Scene Analysis: The Perceptual Organization of Sound
Bregman, A. S., & McAdams, S. E. (1994) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.408434 · Cited by 3,092
Principles of animal communication
(2012) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.49-5059 · Cited by 2,544
Birds sing at a higher pitch in urban noise
Slabbekoorn, H., & Peet, M. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/424267a · Cited by 1,027
Receiver psychology and the evolution of animal signals
Guilford, T., & Dawkins, M. S. (1991) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/s0003-3472(05)80600-1 · Cited by 1,022
Acoustic Communication in Noise
Brumm, H., & Slabbekoorn, H. (2005) · Advances in the study of behavior · doi:10.1016/s0065-3454(05)35004-2 · Cited by 993
Ecology and Evolution of Acoustic Communication in Birds.
Nelson, D. A., Kroodsma, D. E., & Miller, E. H. (1997) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/2266158 · Cited by 969
‘Primitive intelligence’ in the auditory cortex
Näätänen, R., Tervaniemi, M. H., Sussman, E. S., Paavilainen, P., & Winkler, I. (2001) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/s0166-2236(00)01790-2 · Cited by 856
Bronkhorst, A. W. (2000) · TNO Repository · Cited by 799
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Beecher MD Hepper PG Successes and failures of parent-offspring recognition systems in animals. Kin Recognition 1991 94 124 Cambridge University Press Cambridge
- Darwin CJ Carlyon RP Moore BCJ Auditory grouping. Hearing 1995 387 424 Academic Press New York
- Kroodsma DE Miller EH Ecology and Evolution of Acoustic Communication in Birds 1996 Cornell University Press Ithaca, NY
- Naguib M McGregor PK Singing interactions in songbirds. Animal Communication Networks 2005 300 319 Cambridge University Press Cambridge
- Nelken I Jacobson G Ahdut L Ulanovsky N Neural correlates of comodulation masking release in auditory cortex of cats. European Journal of Neuroscience 2000 12 495 495
- Tsuzaki M Takeshima C Irino T Patterson RD Kollmeier B Klump GM Hohmann V Langemann U Mauermann M Uppenkamp S Verhey JL Auditory stream segregation based on speaker size, and identification of size-modulated vowels. Hearing - From Basic Research to Applications 2007 Springer Berlin in press
- Wang D Brown GJ Computational Auditory Scene Analysis: Principles, Algorithms, and Applications 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Hoboken, NJ
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 354
Blind location and separation of callers in a natural chorus using a microphone array
Jones, D. L., & Ratnam, R. (2009) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.3158924 · Cited by 33
Vélez, A., Höbel, G., Gordon, N. M., & Bee, M. A. (2012) · Journal of Comparative Physiology A · doi:10.1007/s00359-012-0760-z · Cited by 33
Self-citationFu, D., Weber, C., Yang, G., Kerzel, M., Nan, W., Barros, P. V. A., Wu, H., Liu, X., & Wermter, S. (2020) · Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnint.2020.00010 · Cited by 36
Carlson, N. V., Healy, S. D., & Templeton, C. N. (2020) · Animal Behavior and Cognition · doi:10.26451/abc.07.02.13.2020 · Cited by 32
Costly help of audiovisual bimodality for female mate choice in a nocturnal anuran (Hyla arborea)
Gomez, D., Théry, M., Gauthier, A.-L., & Lengagne, T. (2011) · Behavioral Ecology · doi:10.1093/beheco/arr039 · Cited by 32
Laird, K. L., Clements, P., Hunter, K. L., & Taylor, R. C. (2016) · Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology · doi:10.1007/s00265-016-2160-9 · Cited by 32
Neural correlates of auditory streaming in an objective behavioral task
Itatani, N., & Klump, G. M. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1321487111 · Cited by 31
Cross-modal integration of multimodal courtship signals in a wolf spider
Kozak, E. C., & Uetz, G. W. (2016) · Animal Cognition · doi:10.1007/s10071-016-1025-y · Cited by 31
de Groot, M., Čokl, A., & Virant‐Doberlet, M. (2010) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.044024 · Cited by 31
Vélez, A., & Bee, M. A. (2012) · Journal of comparative psychology · doi:10.1037/a0030185 · Cited by 30
Self-citationThe Acoustic and Auditory Contexts of Human Behavior
Blake, E. C., & Cross, I. (2015) · Current Anthropology · doi:10.1086/679445 · Cited by 30
Leary, C. J. (2014) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.07.018 · Cited by 29
Acoustic community structure and seasonal turnover in tropical South Asian birds
Krishnan, A. (2019) · Behavioral Ecology · doi:10.1093/beheco/arz087 · Cited by 30
Testing an auditory illusion in frogs: perceptual restoration or sensory bias?
Seeba, F., Schwartz, J. J., & Bee, M. A. (2010) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.03.004 · Cited by 29
Self-citationBrunel-Pons, O., Alem, S., & Greenfield, M. D. (2010) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.10.010 · Cited by 28
Auditory Cortical Processing in Real-World Listening: The Auditory System Going Real
Nelken, I., Bizley, J. K., Shamma, S., & Wang, X. (2014) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2989-14.2014 · Cited by 34
Lee, N., Christensen‐Dalsgaard, J., White, L. A., Schrode, K. M., & Bee, M. A. (2021) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2021.01.048 · Cited by 27
Self-citationBee, M. A. (2010) · Journal of comparative psychology · doi:10.1037/a0020307 · Cited by 26
Self-citationThe neurobiology of vocal communication in marmosets
Grijseels, D. M., Prendergast, B., Gorman, J. C., & Miller, C. T. (2023) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/nyas.15057 · Cited by 27
Species identity cues: possibilities for errors during vibrational communication on plant stems
de Groot, M., Čokl, A., & Virant‐Doberlet, M. (2011) · Behavioral Ecology · doi:10.1093/beheco/arr115 · Cited by 25
The social functions of complex vocal sequences in wild geladas
Gustison, M. L., Johnson, E. T., Beehner, J. C., & Bergman, T. J. (2019) · Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology · doi:10.1007/s00265-018-2612-5 · Cited by 27
Learning Contrast-Invariant Cancellation of Redundant Signals in Neural Systems
Mejías, J. F., Marsat, G., Bol, K., Maler, L., & Longtin, A. (2013) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003180 · Cited by 25
Why are listeners hindered by talker variability?
Luthra, S. (2023) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-023-02355-6 · Cited by 24
Effects of Noise Bandwidth and Amplitude Modulation on Masking in Frog Auditory Midbrain Neurons
Goense, J. B. M., & Feng, A. S. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0031589 · Cited by 24
Animal models for auditory streaming
Itatani, N., & Klump, G. M. (2017) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2016.0112 · Cited by 25
Jung, H., Sherrod, A., LeBreux, S., Price, J. M., & Freeberg, T. M. (2020) · Ethology · doi:10.1111/eth.13013 · Cited by 25
Overcoming Sensory Uncertainty: Factors Affecting Foraging Decisions in Frog-Eating Bats
Page, R. A., & Jones, P. L. (2016) · Animal signals and communication · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-48690-1_11 · Cited by 23
Modeling active sensing reveals echo detection even in large groups of bats
Beleyur, T., & Goerlitz, H. R. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1821722116 · Cited by 23
Song overlapping, noise, and territorial aggression in great tits
Akçay, Ç., Porsuk, Y. K., Avşar, A., Çabuk, D., & Bilgin, C. C. (2020) · Behavioral Ecology · doi:10.1093/beheco/araa030 · Cited by 23
Fishman, Y. I., Micheyl, C., & Steinschneider, M. (2012) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.01010.2011 · Cited by 23
Self-citationDetection of Modulated Tones in Modulated Noise by Non-human Primates
Bohlen, P., Dylla, M. E., Timms, C., & Ramachandran, R. (2014) · Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology · doi:10.1007/s10162-014-0467-7 · Cited by 23
The Sonar Model for Humpback Whale Song Revised
Mercado, E. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01156 · Cited by 23
Directional hearing: from biophysical binaural cues to directional hearing outdoors
Römer, H. (2014) · Journal of Comparative Physiology A · doi:10.1007/s00359-014-0939-6 · Cited by 22
Sound source localization and segregation with internally coupled ears: the treefrog model
Bee, M. A., & Christensen‐Dalsgaard, J. (2016) · Biological Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/s00422-016-0695-5 · Cited by 22
Self-citationPrakash, H., Greif, S., Yovel, Y., & Balakrishnan, R. (2021) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.233262 · Cited by 22
The First Call Note Plays a Crucial Role in Frog Vocal Communication
Yue, X., Fan, Y., Xue, F., Brauth, S. E., Tang, Y., & Fang, G. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-09870-2 · Cited by 22
Spring peepers Pseudacris crucifer modify their call structure in response to noise
Hanna, D. E. L., Wilson, D. R., Blouin‐Demers, G., & Mennill, D. J. (2014) · Current Zoology · doi:10.1093/czoolo/60.4.438 · Cited by 21
Hedwig, D., DeBellis, M., & Wrege, P. H. (2018) · Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology · doi:10.1007/s00265-018-2451-4 · Cited by 22
Automatic Bird Sound Source Separation Based on Passive Acoustic Devices in Wild Environment
Xie, J., Shi, Y., Ni, D., Milling, M., Liu, S., Zhang, J., Qian, K., & Schuller, B. W. (2024) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2024.3354036 · Cited by 19
Aggressive calls improve leading callers’ attractiveness in the treefrog Dendropsophus ebraccatus
Reichert, M. S. (2011) · Behavioral Ecology · doi:10.1093/beheco/arr074 · Cited by 20
Neural Mechanisms for Acoustic Signal Detection under Strong Masking in an Insect
Kostarakos, K., & Römer, H. (2015) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0913-15.2015 · Cited by 19
Detecting modulated signals in modulated noise: (II) neural thresholds in the songbird forebrain
Bee, M. A., Buschermöhle, M., & Klump, G. M. (2007) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05805.x · Cited by 19
Self-citationComplex sensory environments alter mate choice outcomes
Taylor, R. C., Wilhite, K. O., Ludovici, R. J., Mitchell, K. M., Halfwerk, W. H., Page, R. A., Ryan, M. J., & Hunter, K. L. (2020) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.233288 · Cited by 19
Barn owls do not interrupt their siblings
Dreiss, A. N., Ruppli, C. A., Oberli, F., Antoniazza, S., Henry, I., & Roulin, A. (2013) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.04.019 · Cited by 19
Diverse cortical codes for scene segmentation in primate auditory cortex
Malone, B. J., Scott, B. H., & Semple, M. N. (2015) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.01054.2014 · Cited by 18
Streaming of Repeated Noise in Primary and Secondary Fields of Auditory Cortex
Saderi, D., Buran, B. N., & David, S. V. (2020) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2105-19.2020 · Cited by 19
Vélez, A., Linehan-Skillings, B. J., Gu, Y., Sun, Y., & Bee, M. A. (2013) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.4820883 · Cited by 18
Self-citationLiao, C., Magrath, R. D., Manser, M. B., & Farine, D. R. (2024) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2023.0184 · Cited by 17
Communication Masking by Man-Made Noise
Dooling, R. J., & Leek, M. R. (2018) · Springer handbook of auditory research · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-8574-6_2 · Cited by 17
Spoiled for choice: number of signalers constrains mate choice based on acoustic signals
Tanner, J. C., & Simmons, L. W. (2021) · Behavioral Ecology · doi:10.1093/beheco/arab136 · Cited by 16
Chen, Z., Liu, Y., Liang, R., Cui, C., Zhu, Y., Zhang, F., Zhang, J., & Chen, X. (2022) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/s12864-022-08536-2 · Cited by 16
Balakrishnan, R., Bahuleyan, J., Nandi, D., & Jain, M. (2013) · Ecological Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ecoinf.2013.11.006 · Cited by 16
Vélez, A., Gordon, N. M., & Bee, M. A. (2017) · Behavioral Ecology · doi:10.1093/beheco/arx044 · Cited by 16
Self-citationThe Influence of Signaling Conspecific and Heterospecific Neighbors on Eavesdropper Pressure
Trillo, P. A., Benson, C. S., Caldwell, M. S., Lam, T. L., Pickering, O., & Logue, D. M. (2019) · Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.3389/fevo.2019.00292 · Cited by 16
Distracting linguistic information impairs neural tracking of attended speech
Dai, B., McQueen, J. M., Terporten, R., Peter Hagoort, A., & Kösem, A. (2022) · Current Research in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.crneur.2022.100043 · Cited by 16
Larter, L. C., & Ryan, M. J. (2023) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/727469 · Cited by 15
Attention effects on auditory scene analysis: insights from event-related brain potentials
Spielmann, M., Schröger, E., Kotz, S. A., & Bendixen, A. (2014) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-014-0547-7 · Cited by 19
Mate Searching Animals as Model Systems for Understanding Perceptual Grouping
Farris, H. E., & Taylor, R. C. (2016) · Animal signals and communication · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-48690-1_4 · Cited by 15
Robustness of cortical and subcortical processing in the presence of natural masking sounds
Beetz, M. J., García‐Rosales, F., Kössl, M., & Hechavarría, J. C. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-25241-x · Cited by 15
Bee, M. A., & Vélez, A. (2018) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.5064362 · Cited by 15
Self-citationSeparation of overlapping sources in bioacoustic mixtures
Izadi, M. R., Stevenson, R., & Kloepper, L. N. (2020) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/10.0000932 · Cited by 14
A meta-analytic castle built on sand? A comment on Roca et al.
Brumm, H., & Bee, M. A. (2016) · Behavioral Ecology · doi:10.1093/beheco/arw118 · Cited by 14
Self-citationIntegrating Form and Function in the Songbird Auditory Forebrain
Woolley, S. C., & Woolley, S. M. N. (2020) · Springer handbook of auditory research · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-34683-6_5 · Cited by 14
Behera, A. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-80359-9_9 · Cited by 14
Noise affects mate choice based on visual information via cross-sensory interference
Zhu, B., Zhang, H., Chen, Q., He, Q.-L., Zhao, X., Sun, X., Wang, T., Wang, J., & Cui, J. (2022) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2022.119680 · Cited by 14
Hirtenlehner, S., Römer, H., & Schmidt, A. K. D. (2013) · Journal of Comparative Physiology A · doi:10.1007/s00359-013-0869-8 · Cited by 14
Lighting up sound preferences: cross-modal influences on the precedence effect in treefrogs
Reichert, M. S., Symes, L. B., & Höbel, G. (2016) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.07.003 · Cited by 14
How spatial release from masking may fail to function in a highly directional auditory system
Lee, N., & Mason, A. C. (2017) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.20731 · Cited by 14
Absolute Eye Gaze Estimation With Biosensors in Hearing Aids
Favre-Félix, A., Graversen, C., Bhuiyan, T. A., Skoglund, M. A., Rotger-Griful, S., Rank, M. L., Dau, T., & Lunner, T. (2019) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2019.01294 · Cited by 14
Fan, Y., Fang, K., Sun, R., Shen, D., Yang, J., Tang, Y., & Fang, G. (2021) · Current Zoology · doi:10.1093/cz/zoab085 · Cited by 13
What’s Next? The New Era of Autonomous Virtual Humans
Kapadia, M., Shoulson, A., Boatright, C. D., Huang, P., Durupınar, F., & Badler, N. I. (2012) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-34710-8_16 · Cited by 13
Investigating cognitive workload in concurrent speech-based information communication
Fazal, M. A. U., Ferguson, S., & Saeed, Z. (2021) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2021.102728 · Cited by 13
Hwang, J., Noh, J., Lee, S., & Kareem, A. (2019) · International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials · doi:10.1186/s40069-018-0319-7 · Cited by 12
Ponnath, A., Hoke, K. L., & Farris, H. E. (2013) · Journal of Comparative Physiology A · doi:10.1007/s00359-013-0794-x · Cited by 12
Perceived Synchrony of Frog Multimodal Signal Components Is Influenced by Content and Order
Taylor, R. C., Page, R. A., Klein, B. A., Ryan, M. J., & Hunter, K. L. (2017) · Integrative and Comparative Biology · doi:10.1093/icb/icx027 · Cited by 12
Behavioral and neural auditory thresholds in a frog
Taylor, R. C., Akre, K. L., Wilczynski, W., & Ryan, M. J. (2018) · Current Zoology · doi:10.1093/cz/zoy089 · Cited by 12
RetractedGriffiths, T. D., Micheyl, C., & Overath, T. (2012) · Springer handbook of auditory research · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-2314-0_8 · Cited by 11
Self-citationSpielmann, M., Schröger, E., Kotz, S. A., Pechmann, T., & Bendixen, A. (2013) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00534 · Cited by 11
Segregation of task-relevant conditioned stimuli from background stimuli by associative learning
Rothe, T., Deliano, M., Scheich, H., & Stark, H. (2009) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2009.08.055 · Cited by 10
Schwartz, J. J., & Monte, M. E. S. D. (2018) · Bioacoustics · doi:10.1080/09524622.2018.1443836 · Cited by 10
A test of the matched filter hypothesis in two sympatric frogs,Chiromantis doriaeandFeihyla vittata
Yang, Y., Zhu, B., Wang, J., Brauth, S. E., Tang, Y., & Cui, J. (2018) · Bioacoustics · doi:10.1080/09524622.2018.1482786 · Cited by 10
Treefrogs exploit temporal coherence to form perceptual objects of communication signals
Gupta, S., & Bee, M. A. (2020) · Biology Letters · doi:10.1098/rsbl.2020.0573 · Cited by 10
Self-citationAIM: A network model of attention in auditory cortex
Chou, K. F., & Sen, K. (2021) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009356 · Cited by 11
Huang, P., Kapadia, M., & Badler, N. I. (2013) · ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics Symposium on Computer Animation (SCA) · doi:10.1145/2485895.2485911 · Cited by 10
Electrophysiological attention effects in a virtual cocktail-party setting
Münte, T. F., Spring, D. K., Szycik, G. R., & Noesselt, T. (2009) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2009.10.044 · Cited by 10
Veeries Experience More Varied Acoustic Competition at Dawn Than at Dusk
Belinsky, K. L., Hogle, J. L., & Schmidt, K. A. (2012) · The Wilson Journal of Ornithology · doi:10.1676/11-109.1 · Cited by 10
Marchegiani, L., Karadogan, S. G., Andersen, T., Larsen, J. O., & Hansen, L. K. (2011) · International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications · doi:10.1109/icmla.2011.143 · Cited by 9
Spatial release from masking in crocodilians
Thévenet, J., Papet, L., Campos, Z., Greenfield, M. D., Boyer, N., Grimault, N., & Mathevon, N. (2022) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-022-03799-7 · Cited by 6
Target of selective auditory attention can be robustly followed with MEG
Kurmanavičiūtė, D., Kataja, H., Jas, M., Välilä, A., & Parkkonen, L. T. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-37959-4 · Cited by 9
Calls of Recently Introduced Coquí Frogs Do Not Interfere with Cricket Phonotaxis in Hawaii
Zuk, M., Tanner, J. C., Schmidtman, E., Bee, M. A., & Balenger, S. L. (2017) · Journal of Insect Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10905-017-9597-1 · Cited by 9
Self-citationActive hydrodynamic imaging of a rigid spherical particle
Takagi, D., & Strickler, J. R. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-58880-0 · Cited by 9
Reichert, M. S., Luttbeg, B., & Hobson, E. A. (2024) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2023.0186 · Cited by 8
Decision making and preferences for acoustic signals in choice situations by female crickets
Gabel, E., Kuntze, J., & Hennig, R. M. (2015) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.120378 · Cited by 8
Acoustic niche partitioning among seven cuckoo species in a forest in eastern China
Mei, J., Puswal, S. M., Wang, M., & Liu, F. (2023) · Ibis · doi:10.1111/ibi.13228 · Cited by 8
End-to-End Overlapped Speech Detection and Speaker Counting with Raw Waveform
Zhang, W., Sun, M., Wang, L., & Qian, Y. (2019) · IEEE Workshop on Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding (ASRU) · doi:10.1109/asru46091.2019.9003962 · Cited by 8
Caldwell, M. S., Lee, N., & Bee, M. A. (2016) · Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology · doi:10.1007/s10162-016-0568-6 · Cited by 8
Self-citationXu, M., & Shaw, K. L. (2019) · Journal of Heredity · doi:10.1093/jhered/esz062 · Cited by 8
McDermott, J. H. (2018) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119170174.epcn202 · Cited by 8
A biologically oriented algorithm for spatial sound segregation
Chou, K. F., Boyd, A. D., Best, V., Colburn, H. S., & Sen, K. (2022) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2022.1004071 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Bee, M. A., & Micheyl, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Minnesota (US)
- ORCID
- Bee, Mark A.
- Venue
- Journal of Comparative Psychology
- Published
- 2008
- Volume
- 122
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 235-251
- ISSN
- 0093-4127 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2087
- 0735-7036
- PMC
- PMC2692487
- OpenAlex
- W2047527596
- Cited by
- 347
- References
- 208
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 11.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of comparative psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R03DC008396; R01DC07657)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Marine animal studies overview
- Keywords
- cocktail party problem, auditory masking, acoustic interference, speech perception in noise, social signaling, auditory scene analysis, animal hearing
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Animal Communication, Behavior, Animal, Behaviorism, Cues, Humans, Perceptual Masking, Sound Spectrography, Space Perception, Time Factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review