CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 30Sound Studies and AuralityLanguage and cultural evolutionAnimal Vocal Communication and Behavior

The Acoustic and Auditory Contexts of Human Behavior

Open access
Blake, Elizabeth C., Cross, Ian·2015·Current Anthropology
DOI 10.1086/679445
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Sound is a crucial component of the human communicative toolkit; however, as a topic of research, it has been relatively neglected in archaeological method and theory. We propose that a framework requires to be developed in which inferences can be made about the significance of sound in the past that are not bounded by the particularities of current cultural contexts. Such a framework should be multidisciplinary and draw on what is known scientifically about human sensitivities to and uses of sound, including nonverbal vocalizations, speech and music, ethological studies that offer insight into how sound perception and environment affect sociality and survival, and the effects of environment on socially significant human sound.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/679445

Cites

213 of 213 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. ---. 1995. Music, culture and experience: selected papers of John Blacking. Reginald Byron, ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  2. Blake, Elizabeth C. 2011. Stone "tools" as portable sound-producing objects in Upper Palaeolithic contexts: the application of an experimental study. PhD dissertation, University of Cambridge.
  3. Blake, Elizabeth C., and Guy Hayward. 2012. Sound and music in prehistoric context. In Actas das IV jornadas de jovens em investigac ¸a ˜o arqueolo ´gica- JIA conference 2011 Vol. I. Joa ˜o Cascalheira and Ce ´lia Gonc ¸alves, eds. Pp. 437-441. Faro, Portugal: Universidade do Algarve.
  4. Boren, Braxton, and Malcolm Longair. 2011. A method for acoustic modeling of past soundscapes. Paper presented at the Acoustics of Ancient Theatres Conference, Patras, Greece, September 18-21.
  5. Clendinnen, Inga. 2005. Dancing with strangers: the true history of the meeting of the British first fleet and the Aboriginal Australians, 1788. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  6. Crowder, Robert G. 1993. Auditory memory. In Thinking in sound: the cog- nitive psychology of human audition. Stephen McAdams and Emmanuel Bigand, eds. Pp. 113-145. Oxford: Clarendon.
  7. Garfinkel, Yosef. 2003. Dance at the dawn of agriculture. Austin: Texas Uni- versity Press.
  8. Harrison, R. A. 1978. A pierced reindeer phalanx from Banwell Bone Cave and some experimental work on phalangeal whistles. Proceedings of the University of Bristol Spelaeological Society 15:7-22.
  9. Homo-Lechner, Catherine. 1998. False. Authentic. False authenticity. Contri- butions and failures of experimental archaeology as applied to music in- struments. In Hearing the past: essays in historical ethnomusicology and the archaeology of sound. Ann Buckley, ed. Pp. 29-64. Lie `ge, Belgium: Universite ´ de Lie `ge.
  10. Ingold, Tim. 2007. Against soundscape. In Autumn leaves. Angus Carlyle, ed. Pp. 10-13. Paris: Double Entendre. ISO (International Organization for Standardization). 2014. ISO 12913-1: acoustics-soundscape-part 1: definition and conceptual framework. In- ternational Organization for Standardization, Geneva. [JK/MZ]
  11. Karlsson, H. 2000. The acoustic environment as a public domain. Soundscape: The Journal of Acoustic Ecology 1:10-13.
  12. Lawson, Graeme, Christopher Scarre, Ian Cross, and Catherine Hills. 1998. Mounds, megaliths, music and mind: some thoughts on the acoustical properties and purposes of archaeological spaces. Archaeological Review from Cambridge 15:111-134.
  13. ---. 2009. As well as words: Congo Pygmy hunting, mimicry, and play. In Cradle of language volume 2: African perspectives, vol. 2. Rudie Botha and Chris Knight, eds. Pp. 236-256. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  14. Lund, Cajsa S. 1988. On animal calls in ancient Scandinavia: theory and data. In The archaeology of early music cultures. Ellen Hickmann and David W. Hughes, eds. Pp. 289-303. Bonn, Germany: Systematische Musikwissen- schaft GmbH.
  15. ---. 2010. The contributions of sound to archaeology. Teleorman County Museum Bulletin 2:179-195.
  16. O'Connell, John Morgan, and Salwa El-Shawan Costelo-Branco, eds. 2010. Music and conflict. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
  17. Reznikoff, Ie ´gor, and Michel Dauvois. 1988. La dimension sonore des grottes orne ´es. Bulletin de la Socie ´te ´Prehistorique Franc ¸aise 85:238-246.
  18. Scarre, Christopher. 2002. A place of special meaning, interpreting pre-historic monuments in the landscape. In Inscribed landscapes: marking and making places. Bruno David and Meredith Wilson, eds. Pp. 154-175. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press.
  19. ---. 2010. The Suya ´and the white man: forty-five years of musical di- plomacy in Brazil. In Music and conflict. John Morgan O'Connell and Salwa El-Shawan Castelo-Branco, eds. Pp. 109-125. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
  20. Spennemann, Dirk H. R. 1988. Bone toggles reconsidered. In The archaeology of early music cultures. Ellen Hickmann and David W. Hughes, eds. Pp. 23- 29. Bonn, Germany: Systematische Musikwissenschaft GmbH.
  21. ---. 2006. Intentionality of rock-art placement deduced from acoustical measurements and echo myths. In Archaeoacoustics. Christopher Scarre and Graeme Lawson, eds. Pp. 31-39. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Ar- chaeological Research.
  22. Wallin, Nils Lennart, Bjo ¨rn Merker, and Steven Brown. 2000. The origins of music. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  23. Williams, Joe. 2013. Musical space and quiet space in medieval monastic Canterbury. In Making senses of the past: toward a sensory archaeology. Jo Day, ed. Pp. 196-221. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

Related

Authors
Blake, E. C., & Cross, I.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
ORCID
Cross, Ian
Venue
Current Anthropology
Publisher
University of Chicago Press
Published
2015-02
Volume
56
Issue
1
Pages
81-103
ISSN
  • 0011-3204 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5382
DOI
10.1086/679445
OpenAlex
W2054851450
Cited by
30
References
213
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
2.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
public-domain
Locations
  • Current Anthropology (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sound Studies and Aurality
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
Keywords
sound archaeology, acoustic environment, auditory perception, nonverbal vocalizations, speech, ethology, sociality, human behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review