The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Elevated novelty seeking and peculiar d-amphetamine sensitization in periadolescent mice compared with adult mice
Abstract
Novelty seeking as well as amphetamine sensitization were studied in adult (postnatal day "PND" > 60) and periadolescent (PND 3343) mice treated with saline or amphetamine (2 or 10 mg/kg once per day) for 3 days in a familiar environment. After a 48-hr wash-out period, mice were challenged with either saline or amphetamine (2 mg/kg) in the same environment. When given a choice, animals showed a preference for a novel environment, an effect more marked in periadolescents. Acute amphetamine strongly increased novelty seeking in adults, whereas it had an opposite effect in periadolescents. Adult mice in the chronic amphetamine 2 group showed a conditioned preference for the drug-paired compartment, whereas an aversion characterized adult mice in the amphetamine 10 group. Periadolescents in the latter group exhibited a greater sensitization of the locomotor response, but did not show the compulsive licking typical of adults. This appears to be a useful model to study psychobiological risk factors involved in vulnerability to addiction during human adolescence.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“adolescent rodents exhibit increased reinforcing effects to drugs that influence DA release, such as alcohol, nicotine, amphetamines, and cocaine (Adriani, Chiarotti et al. 1998; Laviola, Adriani et al. 1999; Adriani and Laviola 2000; Badanich, Adler et al. 2006; Shram, Funk et al. 2006; Frantz, O'Dell et al. 2007; Mathews and McCormick 2007; Brenhouse and Andersen 2008; Varlinskaya and Spear 2010”
From Developmental imaging genetics: Linking dopamine function to adolescent behavior (2014) · cites this paper as Adriani, Chiarotti et al. 1998
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–201 of 201
Kashefi, A., & Tomaz, C. A. B. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-72219-6_27
Metadata
- Authors
- Adriani, W., Chiarotti, F., & Laviola, G.
- Affiliations
- Istituto Superiore di Sanità (IT)
- Venue
- Behavioral Neuroscience
- Published
- 1998
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1152-1166
- ISSN
- 0735-7044 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-0084
- OpenAlex
- W1993940093
- Cited by
- 247
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 1.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Behavioral Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Keywords
- novelty seeking, amphetamine sensitization, periadolescence, adolescence, addiction vulnerability, locomotor sensitization, drug preference, drug aversion, novelty preference
- MeSH terms
- Aging, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Analysis of Variance, Animals, Body Weight, Corticosterone, Dextroamphetamine, Drug Tolerance, Exploratory Behavior, Grooming, Male, Motor Activity, Repression-Sensitization, Research Design, Multivariate Analysis, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review