The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Older adults' motivated choice for technological innovation: Evidence for benefit-driven selectivity.
Abstract
This study examined older adults' motivation to adopt technological innovation. Sixty-eight older e-mail users and nonusers discussed the use of e-mail and of traditional communication methods in 18 focus groups. The results show older adults' benefit-driven approach to new communication technology. Regardless of whether their decision about the new technology was positive or negative and irrespective of their e-mail experience, participants focused on benefits rather than costs. For traditional media, both costs and benefits were important. Results contradict the common belief that barriers such as usability problems determine whether older people use new technology and indicate the decisive role of perceived benefits for successful innovation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Taking time seriously: A theory of socioemotional selectivity.
Carstensen, L. L., Isaacowitz, D. M., & Charles, S. T. (1999) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.54.3.165 · Cited by 5,377
Age Differences in Attitudes Toward Computers
Czaja, S. J., & Sharit, J. (1998) · The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences · doi:10.1093/geronb/53b.5.p329 · Cited by 380
Silver surfers: Training and evaluating internet use among older adult learners
Cody, M. J., Dunn, D., Hoppin, S., & Wendt, P. (1999) · Communication Education · doi:10.1080/03634529909379178 · Cited by 269
Issues in training older adults to use computers
KELLEY, C. L., & CHARNESS, N. (1995) · Behaviour & Information Technology · doi:10.1080/01449299508914630 · Cited by 223
Cited by
The digital divide has grown old: Determinants of a digital divide among seniors
Friemel, T. N. (2016) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444814538648 · Cited by 1,136
Older adults talk technology: technology usage and attitudes
Mitzner, T. L., Boron, J. B., Fausset, C. B., Adams, A. E., Charness, N., Czaja, S. J., Dijkstra, K., Fisk, A. D., Rogers, W. A., & Sharit, J. (2010) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.020 · Cited by 1,121
Self-citationLee, C., & Coughlin, J. F. (2015) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/jpim.12176 · Cited by 771
Computer use by older adults: A multi-disciplinary review
Wagner, N., Hassanein, K., & Head, M. (2010) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.029 · Cited by 678
Aging and Information Technology Use: Potential and Barriers
Charness, N., & Boot, W. R. (2009) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01647.x · Cited by 674
Metadata
- Authors
- Melenhorst, A.-S., Rogers, W. A., & Bouwhuis, D. G.
- Venue
- Psychology and Aging
- Published
- 2006
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 190-195
- ISSN
- 0882-7974 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1498
- OpenAlex
- W2136777851
- Cited by
- 363
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 28.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Older adults' motivated choice for technological innovation: Evidence for benefit-driven selectivity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/0882-7974.21.1.190
- The paper
- Melenhorst, A.-S., Rogers, W. A., & Bouwhuis, D. G. (2006). Older adults' motivated choice for technological innovation: Evidence for benefit-driven selectivity. Psychology and Aging. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.21.1.190
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
