Cited by 23Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPsychology Research and BibliometricsMeta-analysis and systematic reviews

Procedures for identifying evidence-based psychological treatments for older adults

Yon, Adriana, Scogin, Forrest·2007·Psychology and Aging

Abstract

The authors describe the methods used to identify evidence-based psychological treatments for older adults in this contribution to the special section. Coding teams were assembled to review the literature on several problems relevant to mental health and aging. These teams used the manual developed by the Committee on Science and Practice of the Society for Clinical Psychology (Division 12) of the American Psychological Association that provided definitions of key constructs used in coding. The authors provide an overview of the process followed by the review teams and of some of the issues that emerged to illustrate the steps involved in the coding procedure. Identifying evidence-based treatments is a fundamental aspect of promoting evidence-based practice with older adults; such practice is advocated by most health care disciplines, including psychology.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0882-7974.22.1.4

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The main limitation of Gallagher-Thompson and Coon (2007) was the relatively small number of studies identified, partly because studies were included only if they showed beneficial treatment effects in target problems.

    “The main limitation of this study was the relatively small number of studies identified, partly due to studies only being included if they showed beneficial treatment effects in target problems, a criterion proposed by Yon and Scogin (2007).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yon, A., & Scogin, F.
Affiliations
University of Alabama (US)
Venue
Psychology and Aging
Published
2007-03
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
4-7
ISSN
  • 0882-7974 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1498
OpenAlex
W2090024917
Cited by
23
References
9
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
FWCI
4.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychology and Aging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Keywords
evidence-based psychotherapy, older adults, mental health in aging, coding procedures, evidence-based practice, construct definition
MeSH terms
Aged, Mental Disorders, Humans, Psychology, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Evidence-Based Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review