The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Initial validation of a computer-administered Addiction Severity Index: The ASI–MV.
Abstract
The Addiction Severity Index--Multimedia Version (ASI-MV) is a CD-ROM-based simulation of the interviewer-administered Addiction Severity Index (ASI). Clients in treatment (N = 202) self-administered the ASI-MV to examine the test-retest reliability, criterion validity, and convergent-discriminant validity of the ASI-MV. Excellent test-retest reliability was observed for composite scores and severity ratings. Criterion validity, tested against the interviewer-administered ASI, was good for the composite scores. For severity ratings, variable agreement was observed between the ASI-MV and each interviewer, suggesting poor interrater reliability among interviewers. This conclusion was bolstered by a finding of superior convergent-discriminant validity for both composite scores and severity ratings compared to the standard ASI. The ASI-MV is a viable alternative to the expensive and potentially unreliable interviewer-administered version.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Digital interventions for SUDs have demonstrated efficacy for screening and assessment 251- 253 , treatment 254,255 and recovery 250,256 , as stand- alone tools or as adjuncts to clinician- delivered in terventions.”
From Substance use disorders: a comprehensive update of classification, epidemiology, neurobiology, clinical aspects, treatment and prevention (2023) · cites this paper as [251]
Citations
Cites
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529310 · Cited by 81,148
Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.
Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0046016 · Cited by 17,116
Psychometric theory (2nd ed.).
Sitgreaves, R. (1979) · Contemporary Psychology · doi:10.1037/018882 · Cited by 14,384
Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients.
McGraw, K. O., & Wong, S. P. (1996) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.1.1.30 · Cited by 6,903
The Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL): A self-report symptom inventory
Derogatis, L. R., Lipman, R. S., Rickels, K., Uhlenhuth, E. H., & Covi, L. (1974) · Behavioral Science · doi:10.1002/bs.3830190102 · Cited by 4,604
The Fifth Edition of the Addiction Severity Index.
Mclellan, A., Kushner, H., Metzger, D., Peters, R., Smith, I. E., Grissom, G. R., Pettinati, H., & Argeriou, M. (1992) · Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment · doi:10.1016/0740-5472(92)90062-s · Cited by 4,280
Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions, 2nd ed
GROVE, W. A. (1981) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.138.12.1644-a · Cited by 3,756
The Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test: The Quest for a New Diagnostic Instrument
Selzer, M. L. (1971) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.127.12.1653 · Cited by 3,431
An Improved Diagnostic Evaluation Instrument for Substance Abuse Patients
McLellan, A. T., Luborsky, L. B., WOODY, G. E., & Brien, C. P. O. (1980) · The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/00005053-198001000-00006 · Cited by 3,163
Skinner, H. A. (1982) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/0306-4603(82)90005-3 · Cited by 3,134 · cited 1×
“ASI Drug domain was compared with the Drug Abuse Screening Test (DAST, Skinner, 1982 ).”
Turner, C. F., Ku, L. C., Rogers, S., Lindberg, L., Pleck, J. H., & Sonenstein, F. L. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.280.5365.867 · Cited by 2,048
Assessment of social adjustment by patient self report.
Weissman, M. M. (1976) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1976.01770090101010 · Cited by 1,782
New Data from the Addiction Severity Index Reliability and Validity in Three Centers
McLELLAN, A. T., LUBORSKY, L., CACCIOLA, J., GRIFFITH, J., EVANS, F., BARR, H. L., & OʼBRIEN, C. P. (1985) · The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/00005053-198507000-00005 · Cited by 1,503
Self-citationThe Addiction Severity Index: reliability and validity in a Dutch addict population.
Hendriks, V., Kaplan, C. D., van Limbeek, J., & Geerlings, P. (1989) · Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment · doi:10.1016/0740-5472(89)90041-x · Cited by 255
More Data on the Addiction Severity Index
DAVID, C., HODGINS, & el‐Guebaly, N. (1992) · The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/00005053-199203000-00009 · Cited by 183
Consistency of self‐administered and interview‐based Addiction Severity Index composite scores
Rosen, C. S., Henson, B. R., Finney, J. W., & Moos, R. H. (2000) · Addiction · doi:10.1046/j.1360-0443.2000.95341912.x · Cited by 182
Interviewer severity ratings and composite scores of the ASI: a further look.
Alterman, A., Brown, L., Zaballero, A., & McKay, J. (1994) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/0376-8716(94)90157-0 · Cited by 144
B., H., & Mursell, J. L. (1948) · Population · doi:10.2307/1523830 · Cited by 89
Butler, S., Newman, F., Cacciola, J., Frank, A. F., Budman, S., Mclellan, A., Ford, S., Blaine, J., Gastfriend, D., Moras, K., et al. (1998) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.10.4.399 · Cited by 29
Self-citationPredicting ASI Interviewer Severity Ratings for a Computer-Administered Addiction Severity Index
Butler, S. F., Newman, F. L., Cacciola, J. S., Budman, S. H., & McLellan, T. A. (1998) · Cited by 6
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- McLellan, 1985, Guide to the Addiction Severity Index: Background administration and field testing results.
- 1993, Assessing client needs using the ASI: A handbook for program administrators. (NIH Publication No. 93-3619).
- Navaline, 1994, An automated version of the Risk Assessment Battery (RAB): Enhancing the assessment of risk behaviors., AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses, 10, S281
- Nunnally, 1978, Psychometric theory.
- Ware, 1995, SF-12: How to score the SF-12 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales.
- Zucker, 1996, The Antisocial Behavior Checklist (Version 2).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
User’s manual for the SF-12v2 health survey
Ware, J., Kosinski, M., Bowker, D., Gandek, B., Ware, J. E., & Turner‐Bowker, D. M. (2002) · Cited by 1,085
Volkow, N. D., & Blanco, C. (2023) · World psychiatry · doi:10.1002/wps.21073 · Cited by 503
The Addiction Severity Index at 25: Origins, contributions, and transitions
McLellan, A. T., Cacciola, J. C., Alterman, A. I., Rikoon, S. H., & Carise, C. (2006) · The American Journal on Addictions · doi:10.1080/10550490500528316 · Cited by 450
Self-citationA conceptual framework for drug treatment process and outcomes
Simpson, D. D. (2004) · Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment · doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2004.06.001 · Cited by 333
Studies of the reliability and validity of the Addiction Severity Index.
Mäkelä, K. (2004) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2003.00665.x · Cited by 309
Metadata
- Authors
- Bultler, S. F., Budman, S. H., Goldman, R. J., Newman, F. J., Beckley, K. E., Trottier, D., & Cacciola, J. S.
- Venue
- Psychology of Addictive Behaviors
- Published
- 2001-03
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 4-12
- ISSN
- 0893-164X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1501
- OpenAlex
- W2145888052
- Cited by
- 127
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 3.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychology of Addictive Behaviors (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (R44DA009938, 2R44DA09938)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Keywords
- Addiction Severity Index, self-report, addiction severity, test-retest reliability, criterion validity, convergent validity, discriminant validity, inter-rater reliability, CD-ROM
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, New England, Severity of Illness Index, User-Computer Interface, Reproducibility of Results, Substance-Related Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
