Longitudinal associations between hostility in adolescents' family relationships and friendships and hostility in their romantic relationships.
Abstract
This study examined longitudinal predictors of hostility in adolescents' romantic relationships. The sample included 110 adolescents and their parents from 72 families. Observational measures of parents' marital hostility and parent-child hostility and self-reports of hostility in close friendships were collected when adolescents ranged from 14 to 16 years old. Three years later, when they were 17 to 19 years old, adolescents reported on the hostility in their romantic relationships. Results indicated that hostility in parents' marital relationships and in adolescents' friendships accounted for independent variance in hostility in adolescents' later romantic relationships. Results highlight the importance of both family relationships and friendships for predicting hostility in adolescents' romantic relationships over time.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Interparental conflict had a direct effect on romantic relationship conflict, with more interparental conflict associated with more conflict in adolescents' romantic relationships.
“Consistent with previous reports, interparental conflict had a direct effect on romantic relationship conflict such that more interparental conflict was associated with more conflict in adolescents’ romantic relationships (Kingsfogel & Grych, 2004; Stocker & Richmond, 2007).”
From Interparental Conflict and Adolescents’ Romantic Relationship Conflict (2010) · cites this paper as Stocker & Richmond, 2007
Exposure to interparental hostility predicts adolescents' use of verbal attack and mild psychological aggression with romantic partners.
“exposure to interparental hostility predicts adolescents’ use of verbal attack and mild psychological aggression with romantic partners (Stocker & Richmond, 2007).”
From Interparental Conflict and Adolescents’ Romantic Relationship Conflict (2010) · cites this paper as Stocker & Richmond, 2007
Cites
Contemporary research on parenting: The case for nature and nurture
Collins, W. A., Maccoby, E. E., Steinberg, L., Hetherington, E. M., & Bornstein, M. H. (2000) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.55.2.218 · Cited by 1,523 · see citing works
Competence in early adult romantic relationships: A developmental perspective on family influences.
Conger, R. D., Cui, M., Bryant, C. M., & Elder, G. H. (2000) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.2.224 · Cited by 480 · see citing works
Kinsfogel, K. M., & Grych, J. H. (2004) · Journal of Family Psychology · doi:10.1037/0893-3200.18.3.505 · Cited by 293 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The importance of friendship for youth with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder
Mikami, A. Y. (2010) · Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10567-010-0067-y · Cited by 195 · see citing works
Mikami, A. Y., Szwedo, D. E., Allen, J. P., Evans, M. A., & Hare, A. L. (2010) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0017420 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Interparental Conflict and Adolescents’ Romantic Relationship Conflict
Simon, V. A., & Furman, W. (2010) · Journal of Research on Adolescence · doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2009.00635.x · Cited by 70 · see citing works
- Authors
- Stocker, C. M., & Richmond, M. K.
- Affiliations
- University of Denver (US)
- ORCID
- Richmond, Melissa K.
- Venue
- Journal of Family Psychology
- Published
- 2007
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 490-497
- ISSN
- 0893-3200 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1293
- OpenAlex
- W2091524266
- Cited by
- 62
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 5.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Family Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (R29 MH51783; RO1 MH51783)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
- Keywords
- adolescent romantic relationships, adolescent friendships, family relationships, longitudinal predictors, emerging adulthood
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Family Relations, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Hostility, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Love, Male, Parent-Child Relations, Surveys and Questionnaires, Friends
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
