CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 104Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentFamily Dynamics and RelationshipsPsychosocial Factors Impacting Youth

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 75 of the 78 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A family process model of marital hostility, parental depressive affect, and early adolescent problem behavior: the roles of triangulation and parental warmth

Franck, Karen L., Buehler, Cheryl·2007·Journal of Family Psychology
DOI 10.1037/0893-3200.21.4.614
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This study examined a family process model of early adolescent problem behavior in a community sample of 416 two-parent families. With family systems theory, a model was developed that suggests (a) marital hostility and parental depressive affect are conjoint familial stressors for youths, (b) youth triangulation mediates the association between marital hostility and adolescent problems, and (c) parental warmth buffers the negative effects of parental depressive affect and youth triangulation. With structural equation modeling, youth-perceived triangulation mediated the association between marital hostility and adolescent internalizing problems. Marital hostility was associated with externalizing problems. Mothers' depressive affect was associated with internalizing problems, and fathers' depressive affect was associated with internalizing and externalizing problems. Parental warmth was not a significant moderator.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0893-3200.21.4.614

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 104

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Franck, K. L., & Buehler, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Greensboro (US)
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Family Psychology
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
Published
2007
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
614-625
ISSN
  • 0893-3200 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1293
DOI
10.1037/0893-3200.21.4.614
OpenAlex
W2112780750
Cited by
104
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
FWCI
5.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Family Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01-MH59248)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Psychosocial Factors Impacting Youth
Keywords
marital hostility, adolescent behavior problems, triangulation, parental warmth, family systems theory, internalizing problems, externalizing problems, parental stress, buffering effect, two-parent families
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Psychology, Adolescent, Child, Conflict, Psychological, Depression, Family, Female, Hostility, Humans, Male, Marriage, Parent-Child Relations, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Schools, Tennessee

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review