Cited by 84Schizophrenia research and treatmentVisual perception and processing mechanismsHallucinations in medical conditions

Vernier threshold in patients with schizophrenia and in their unaffected siblings

Open access
Kéri, Szabolcs, Kelemen, Oguz, Benedek, György, Janka, Zoltán·2004·Neuropsychology

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate magnocellular (M) and parvocellular (P) visual functions in nonmedicated patients with schizophrenia and in their unaffected siblings. Possible abnormalities in cortical integration of retinal receptive fields also were addressed. Twenty-two nonmedicated patients with schizophrenia, their unaffected siblings, and 20 age- and IQ-matched healthy control subjects received 4 vernier acuity tasks (blue-on-yellow, frequency-doubling, achromatic low and high contrast conditions) in which they were asked to detect the spatial alignment of dots and gratings. Results revealed that the patients with schizophrenia and their unaffected siblings showed selective dysfunctions in the frequency-doubling and achromatic low contrast conditions, which were devoted to investigate M pathways. In the isoluminant blue-on-yellow and high contrast achromatic conditions, there were no significant differences between the experimental groups. These results suggest that the deficit of M pathway is an endophenotype of schizophrenia.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0894-4105.18.3.537

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patients with schizophrenia show preferential M-pathway dysfunction, although deficits have also been observed in parvocellular processing.

    “Patients with schizophrenia show preferential M-pathway dysfunction (21,22,28,35–38), although deficits have also been observed in parvocellular processing (19,20).”

    From Visual perception and its impairment in schizophrenia (2008) · cites this paper as [38]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 53 · Cited by 84

Authors
Kéri, S., Kelemen, O., Benedek, G., & Janka, Z.
Affiliations
University of Szeged (HU)
Venue
Neuropsychology
Published
2004
Volume
18
Issue
3
Pages
537-542
ISSN
  • 0894-4105 (ISSN-L)
  • 1931-1559
OpenAlex
W1997145372
Cited by
84
References
53
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 1
FWCI
6.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Neuropsychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • SZTE Publicatio Repozitórium (University of Szeged) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hallucinations in medical conditions
Keywords
schizophrenia, vernier acuity, magnocellular pathway, parvocellular pathway, endophenotypes, unaffected siblings, second harmonic generation, achromatic contrast
MeSH terms
Adult, Color Perception, Discrimination Learning, Female, Geniculate Bodies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Orientation, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Perceptual Disorders, Psychophysics, Reference Values, Retinal Ganglion Cells, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Sensory Thresholds, Visual Acuity, Visual Cortex, Visual Pathways, Visual Perception, Contrast Sensitivity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review