Reliability and validity of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test in studies of autism.
Abstract
Three studies were conducted with the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) with autistic individuals. In Study 1, it was found that the traditional WCST is a highly reliable test for use with both autistic children and children with learning disabilities over time. In Study 2, the equivalence of the s
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Children with ASD may be less motivated by social than non-social rewards.
“This finding is consistent with previous research examining the effect of reward type on task performance, which indicates that children with ASD may be less motivated by social than non-social rewards [480,565-568].”
From Reward circuitry dysfunction in psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders and genetic syndromes: animal models and clinical findings (2012) · cites this paper as [567]
The traditional WCST scoring system cannot distinguish among these cognitive processes.
“None of these processes can be distinguished by the traditional task scoring system [24–26].”
From The paradox of cognitive flexibility in autism (2009) · cites this paper as [25]
WCST failure can result from deficits in multiple cognitive processes, including learning from feedback, maintaining the goal, noticing a needed strategy change, inhibiting a previous response, switching responses, and sustaining responding.
“Failure on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Task can be because of deficits in various cognitive processes including learning from feedback, keeping the goal of the task in mind, noticing that a change in strategy is necessary, inhibiting a previous motor response, switching to another response and sustaining responding over time.”
From The paradox of cognitive flexibility in autism (2009) · cites this paper as [25]
Failure on the WCST may be due to social-motivational factors.
“For example, failure on the WCST might be because of social-motivational factors [25,26]”
From The paradox of cognitive flexibility in autism (2009) · cites this paper as [25]
Individuals with ASD perform better on a given task when presented by computer rather than live administration by an experimenter, whereas typically-developing comparison groups perform similarly across modalities.
“multiple studies have reported that individuals with ASD perform better on a given task when presented by computer rather than live administration by an experimenter, whereas typically-developing comparison groups perform similarly across modalities”
From Can Bilingualism Mitigate Set-Shifting Difficulties in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders? (2019) · cites this paper as Ozonoff, 1995
Children with ASD have been found to perform better on EF tasks that use computerized rather than live administration by an examiner, which has been attributed to reduced social demands.
“As discussed in the introduction, children with ASD have been found to exhibit better performance on EF tasks that employ computerized versus live administration by an examiner (Kenworthy et al., 2008;Ozonoff, 1995;Pascualvaca et al., 1998), which has been attributed to the reduced social demands required of them.”
From Can Bilingualism Mitigate Set-Shifting Difficulties in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders? (2019) · cites this paper as Ozonoff, 1995
Computerized testing reduces the social demands of face-to-face interactions for children with ASD.
“The computerized testing modality was used to decrease the social demands of face-to-face interactions for children with ASD, as suggested by prior research on set-shifting in this population (e.g., Ozonoff, 1995;Pascualvaca et al., 1998).”
From Can Bilingualism Mitigate Set-Shifting Difficulties in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders? (2019) · cites this paper as Ozonoff, 1995
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 7 · Cited by 293
- Authors
- Ozonoff, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Utah (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ozonoff, Sally
- ORCID
- Ozonoff, Sally
- Venue
- Neuropsychology
- Published
- 1995-10
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 491-500
- ISSN
- 0894-4105 (ISSN-L)
- 1931-1559
- OpenAlex
- W2062665923
- Cited by
- 293
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 25
- FWCI
- 1.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neuropsychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Keywords
- Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, autism spectrum disorder, test reliability, test validity, neuropsychological assessment, children with autism, learning disabilities, test equivalence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review