Lucid dreaming.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Lucid dreamers report inability to focus on fine visual details, paralleling mental imagery.
“Other evidence comes from lucid dreamers[25] who report that it is impossible to focus on fine-grain details of visual objects, as is the case in mental imagery[112].”
From Dreaming and the brain: from phenomenology to neurophysiology (2010) · cites this paper as [25]
Lucid dreamers report that it is impossible to focus on fine-grain details of visual objects, as is the case in mental imagery.
“Other evidence comes from lucid dreamers[25] who report that it is impossible to focus on fine-grain details of visual objects, as is the case in mental imagery[112].”
From Dreaming and the brain: from phenomenology to neurophysiology (2010) · cites this paper as [25]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Phenomenal transparency and cognitive self-reference
Metzinger, T. (2003) · Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1023/b:phen.0000007366.42918.eb · Cited by 162 · see citing works
- Authors
- LaBerge, S., & Gackenbach, J.
- ORCID
- LaBerge, Stephen
- Venue
- Varieties of anomalous experience: Examining the scientific evidence.
- Publisher
- American Psychological Association
- Published
- 2004-10-27
- Pages
- 151-182
- OpenAlex
- W4244903247
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2019: 18 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 0.99
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Psychological Association eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs
- Keywords
- lucid dreaming, dream awareness, REM sleep, sleep
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
