Cited by 597Sleep and Wakefulness ResearchPhilosophy and Theoretical ScienceSleep and related disorders

Dreaming and the brain: from phenomenology to neurophysiology

Open access
Nir, Yuval, Tononi, Giulio·2010·Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Abstract

Dreams are a most remarkable experiment in psychology and neuroscience, conducted every night in every sleeping person. They show that our brain, disconnected from the environment, can generate by itself an entire world of conscious experiences. Content analysis and developmental studies have furthered our understanding of dream phenomenology. In parallel, brain lesion studies, functional imaging, and neurophysiology have advanced our knowledge of the neural basis of dreaming. It is now possible to start integrating these two strands of research in order to address some fundamental questions that dreams pose for cognitive neuroscience: how conscious experiences in sleep relate to underlying brain activity; why the dreamer is largely disconnected from the environment; and whether dreaming is more closely related to mental imagery or to perception.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tics.2009.12.001

Cites

167 of 167 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

1 of 47 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Background

    There may be an antagonism between externally oriented cortical networks and internally oriented default-mode networks.

    “An intriguing possibility concerns the putative antagonism between externally oriented cortical networks and internally oriented, default-mode networks[92, 93].”
    Quote in the paperNot yet classified1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [92] Golland, 2007, Extrinsic and intrinsic systems in the posterior cortex of the human brain revealed during natural sensory stimulation, Cereb. Cortex source

      The Introduction distinguishes an externally driven extrinsic system from an intrinsic system associated with internally driven functions, and the default-mode comparison reports that parts of the intrinsic system deactivate during visual stimulation. But the same comparison explicitly says this study did not observe a negative correlation between the two systems. The paper therefore supports a possible tension between them, not a demonstrated antagonistic relationship. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [93] Ioannides, 2009, MEG identifies dorsal medial brain activations during sleep, Neuroimage source
  • Finding

    Histamine levels appear correlated with the capacity to incorporate sensory stimuli into conscious experience.

    “Neuromodulatory activity in cataplectic dogs is largely similar to that in REM sleep except that levels of histamine are high, much like during wakefulness[105]. It thus seems that levels of histamine are correlated with our ability to incorporate sensory stimuli into conscious experience.”
    Quote in the paperNot yet classified0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [105] Gallop, 1990

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Finding

    Dreaming normally involves a marked loss of voluntary control over actions and thoughts.

    “In fact, during dreaming there is a prominent reduction of voluntary control of action and thought. We cannot pursue goals, and have no control over the dream’s content.”
    Quote in the paperNot yet classified
  • Finding

    Dreams are predominantly visual, colored, shape-rich, movement-filled, and include waking categories like people, faces, places, objects, and animals.

    “Dreams are highly visual, in full color, rich in shapes, full of movement, and incorporate typical wakefulness categories such as people, faces, places, objects, and animals[3].”
    Quote in the paperNot yet classified0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [3] Hobson, 1988

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Finding

    External stimuli generally fail to enter dream content, though some stimuli have a slightly higher chance.

    “Moreover, stimuli not only fail to elicit a behavioral response, but also largely fail to be incorporated in the content of the dream[8, 84–86] (though some stimuli, such as a spray of water, pressure on the limbs, and meaningful words have a slightly higher chance of incorporation[84, 85]).”
    Quote in the paperNot yet classified0 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [8] Rechtschaffen, 1965, Effect of visual stimuli on dream content, Percept. Mot. Skills source
    • cites [84] Berger, 1963, Experimental modification of dream content by meaningful verbal stimuli, Br. J. Psychiatry source
    • cites [85] Koulack, 1969, Effects of somatosensory stimulation on dream content, Arch. Gen. Psychiatry source
    • cites [86] Steriade, 2003

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The modification of memory performance across early childhood parallels the improvement of dream recall rates in children.

    “The modification of memory performance across early childhood, due in the firsts ages to the so-called infantile amnesia72–74 and subsequently to the development of cognitive functions,67 parallel the improvement of dream recall rates in children.”

    From Spotlight on dream recall: the ages of dreams (2018) · cites this paper as [73]

    The section ‘Similarities between dreaming and waking’ reports that children’s dream reports become more frequent around age seven and begin to include episodic memories. But it explicitly says children’s dream recall correlates best with mental imagery and visuo-spatial skills, rather than memory capabilities; it does not support the claimed parallel with memory performance. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Infantile amnesia and confabulatory reports in infancy are the main reasons why reliable studies in this age range cannot be carried out.

    “infantile amnesia and confabulatory reports in infancy are the main reasons why reliable studies in this age range cannot be carried out.73,74”

    From Spotlight on dream recall: the ages of dreams (2018) · cites this paper as [73]

    The section on similarities between dreaming and waking links infantile amnesia to preschoolers’ limited episodic recollection, while Contemporary dream research discusses general limits on the trustworthiness of dream reports. Neither passage identifies confabulatory reports in infancy as a reason studies cannot be carried out, or says these are the main reasons; the paper discusses dream reports from children aged 2–5. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The regions implicated in emotional processes during wakefulness are also responsible for the neurophysiological background of REM sleep that can explain some qualitative features of dream experience.

    “the regions implicated in emotional processes during wakefulness are also responsible for the neurophysiological background of REM sleep that can explain some qualitative features of DE”

    From The Functional Role of Dreaming in Emotional Processes (2019) · cites this paper as Nir and Tononi, 2010

    The ‘Emotionality’ subsection reports marked activation of limbic and paralimbic regions during REM sleep alongside emotional dream experiences. But it describes an association, not a finding that those regions are responsible for REM sleep’s neurophysiology or explain dream emotions; it also notes that emotions are absent from 25–30% of REM sleep reports. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Mental imagery shares the same neuronal substrates as dreaming.

    “Considering that mental imagery shares the same neuronal substrates as dreaming [2,73]”

    From How Adversarial REM Dreams May Facilitate Creativity, and Why We Become Aware of Them (2024) · cites this paper as [2]

    In “Are dreams more like perception or imagination?” (page unavailable), the paper says that damage to the temporo-parieto-occipital junction affects both dreaming and waking mental imagery. It describes this as evidence that dreaming may be more closely related to imagination than perception, but treats a comparison of their functional networks as an open question. The categorical claim that they share the same neuronal substrates therefore goes beyond the evidence presented. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Although sleep is often associated with rest, the brain remains highly active, with neuronal activity persisting but exhibiting frequency patterns distinct from wakefulness.

    “Although sleep is often associated with “rest,” the brain remains highly active, with neuronal activity persisting but exhibiting frequency patterns distinct from those observed during wakefulness23,24.”

    From Energy paradox in REM sleep: balancing supply and consumption in brain metabolism (2026) · cites this paper as [24]

    The ‘Phenomenology of dreams and their relation to brain activity’ section says neural activity persists during slow-wave sleep. The ‘What determines the level of consciousness during sleep?’ section describes large slow waves in NREM sleep, but also says REM sleep has a fast, low-voltage EEG resembling wakefulness. Thus, the claim that sleep generally has frequency patterns distinct from wakefulness overgeneralizes across sleep stages. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

9 of the 176 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Hartmann, 1968, The day residue: time distribution of waking events, Psychophysiology, 5, 222
  2. Doricchi, 1992, Dream recall in brain-damaged patients: A contribution to the neuropsychology of dreaming through a review of the literature, 99

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nir, Y., & Tononi, G.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Venue
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-02
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
88-100
ISSN
1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2081767153
Cited by
595
References
176
Citations by year
2026: 42 · 2025: 64 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 51 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 24
FWCI
1.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5p20mh077967-04, DP1OD000579)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (P20MH-077967)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
Keywords
dreams, phenomenology of dreams, brain lesions, functional imaging, mental imagery, perception, sleep
MeSH terms
Brain, Consciousness, Dreams, Emotions, Environment, Humans, Imagination, Neurophysiology, Perception, Psychophysiology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read (extract-v2) on 2026-09-26.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review