The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Meaning reconstruction & the experience of loss.
Abstract
Debunking the notion that an invariant sequence of stages of grief occurs among all who experience the death of a loved one, this groundbreaking volume clearly demonstrates that highly individual processes of meaning-making are at the heart of grief dynamics. Leading the reader through earlier conceptions of grief and mourning in which successful grieving is viewed as withdrawal of psychic energy from the deceased, the healthy role of continued symbolic bonds is stressed as well as appreciation of life-enhancing growth as one integrates the lessons of loss. A prominent theme in the volume is that symptoms in the bereaved have meaning-making significance, and that meaning reconstruction in response to loss is the central process in grieving. More scientifically oriented readers will find comprehensive discussions of research programmes supporting these tenets, particularly those linking grief with responses to loss involved in trauma. Practitioners will find clinically informed models and ample case descriptions to bridge concepts with the lived world of real people suffering real losses. All should find new paradigms for approaching loss and reconstruction of meaning in a respectful, revealing way that has significance both personally and professionally.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kübler-Ross, E. (1975) · PubMed · Cited by 4,935
Handbook of bereavement research: Consequences, coping, and care.
(2001) · doi:10.1037/10436-000 · Cited by 947
Marris, P. (1974) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 648
Constructivism in psychotherapy.
(1995) · American Psychological Association eBooks · doi:10.1037/10170-000 · Cited by 424
Lessons of Loss: A Guide to Coping
Neimeyer, R. A., & Lyddon, W. J. (1999) · Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy · doi:10.1891/0889-8391.13.4.393 · Cited by 293
Broken hearts or broken bonds: Love and death in historical perspective.
Stroebe, M., Gergen, M., Gergen, K. J., & Stroebe, W. (1992) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.47.10.1205 · Cited by 278
Bowers, M. K., & Feifel, H. (1962) · Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion · doi:10.2307/1384713 · Cited by 267
Farberow, N. L., & Shneidman, E. S. (1961) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 263
Quantitative or qualitative? Measurement issues in the study of grief.
Neimeyer, R. A., & Hogan, N. S. (2001) · Handbook of bereavement research: Consequences, coping, and care. · doi:10.1037/10436-004 · Cited by 196
Constructions of disorder: Meaning-making frameworks for psychotherapy.
(2000) · American Psychological Association eBooks · doi:10.1037/10368-000 · Cited by 185
Cited by
TARGET ARTICLE: "Posttraumatic Growth: Conceptual Foundations and Empirical Evidence"
Tedeschi, R. G., & Calhoun, L. G. (2004) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1207/s15327965pli1501_01 · Cited by 7,154
Park, C. L. (2010) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0018301 · Cited by 3,174
Sears, S. R., Stanton, A. L., & Danoff-Burg, S. (2003) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/0278-6133.22.5.487 · Cited by 803
Under Threat: Responses to and the Consequences of Threats to Individuals' Identities
Petriglieri, J. L. (2011) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2009.0087 · Cited by 706
Gillies, J., & Neimeyer, R. A. (2006) · Journal of Constructivist Psychology · doi:10.1080/10720530500311182 · Cited by 678
Metadata
- Venue
- American Psychological Association eBooks
- Publisher
- American Psychological Association
- Published
- 2001
- OpenAlex
- W1713860771
- Cited by
- 1,014
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 21.24
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Meaning reconstruction & the experience of loss. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/10397-000
- The paper
- Meaning reconstruction & the experience of loss. (2001). American Psychological Association eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1037/10397-000
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.