CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 947Grief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthDeath, Funerary Practices, and MourningDeath Anxiety and Social Exclusion

Handbook of bereavement research: Consequences, coping, and care.

Margaret Stroebe, Robert O. Hansson, Wolfgang Stroebe, Henk A. W. Schut·2001·American Psychological Association eBooks
DOI 10.1037/10436-000
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

New research continues to challenge our assumptions about the fundamental nature and course of grief: its roots in our biology, our emotions, and our social interactions. The of Bereavement Research provides a broad view of diverse contemporary approaches to bereavement, examining both normal adaptation and complicated manifestations of grief. In this volume, leading interdisciplinary scholars focus on three important themes in bereavement research: consequences, coping and care. In exploring the consequences of bereavement, authors examine developmental factors that influence grief both for the individual and the family at different phases of the life cycle. In exploring coping, they describe exciting new empirical studies about how people can and do cope with grief, without professional intervention. People do not grieve alone, so chapters on coping present new ways to understand grief at an interpersonal level as well. Until recently, intervention for the bereaved has not been scientifically guided and has become the subject of challenging differences of opinion and approach. Chapters in the care section of the volume critically examine interventions to date and provide guidance for assessment and more empirically guided treatment strategies. The Handbook provides an up-to-date comprehensive review of scientific knowledge about bereavement in an authoritative yet accessible way that should be useful reading for researchers, practitioners and health care professionals in the 21st century.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/10436-000

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The more severe the grief process (irrespective of cause of death), the more chance that therapeutic interventions will have positive results.

    “and the more severe the grief process (irrespective of the cause of death), the more chance that therapeutic interventions will have positive results [31].”

    From Essential Questions on Suicide Bereavement and Postvention (2011) · cites this paper as [31]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Stroebe, M., Hansson, R. O., Stroebe, W., & Schut, H. A. W.
Affiliations
Utrecht University (NL)
ORCID
Venue
American Psychological Association eBooks
Publisher
American Psychological Association
Published
2001
DOI
10.1037/10436-000
OpenAlex
W319435564
Cited by
947
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 48 · 2014: 47 · 2013: 66 · 2012: 70
FWCI
27.26
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Psychological Association eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
Keywords
bereavement, grief, complicated grief, coping with grief, bereavement interventions, grief assessment, family bereavement, life cycle

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review