Cited by 244Psychological Testing and AssessmentAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesBehavioral and Psychological Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 92 of the 92 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An overview of self-monitoring research in assessment and treatment.

Korotitsch, William J., Nelson-Gray, Rosemery O.·1999·Psychological Assessment

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/1040-3590.11.4.415

Cites

92 of 92 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 92 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–244 of 244

Metadata

Authors
Korotitsch, W. J., & Nelson-Gray, R. O.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Greensboro (US)
Venue
Psychological Assessment
Published
1999-12
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
415-425
ISSN
  • 1040-3590 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-134X
OpenAlex
W2040860175
Cited by
241
References
92
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 6
FWCI
7.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychological Assessment (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
self-monitoring, behavior analysis, applied behavior analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review