Methodological considerations in the refinement of clinical assessment instruments.

Smith, Gregory T., McCarthy, Denis M.·1995·Psychological Assessment
DOI 10.1037//1040-3590.7.3.300

Cites (6)

  1. Negative affectivity: the disposition to experience aversive emotional states
    Watson, David, Clark, Lee A. · 1984 · Psychological Bulletin
  2. Tripartite model of anxiety and depression: psychometric evidence and taxonomic implications
    Clark, Lee Anna, Watson, David · 1991 · Journal of Abnormal Psychology
  3. Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments.
    Floyd, Frank J., Widaman, Keith F. · 1995 · Psychological Assessment
  4. Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective.
    Bollen, Kenneth, Lennox, Richard · 1991 · Psychological Bulletin
  5. Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods.
    Haynes, Stephen N., Richard, David C. S., Kubany, Edward S. · 1995 · Psychological Assessment
  6. Limitations of Coefficient Alpha as an Index of Test Unidimensionality1
    Green, Samuel B., Lissitz, Robert W., Mulaik, Stanlen A. · 1977 · Educational and Psychological Measurement

Show all 6 references

Cited by (25)

  1. Using Self-Report Assessment Methods to Explore Facets of Mindfulness
    Baer, Ruth A., Smith, Gregory T., Hopkins, Jaclyn, Krietemeyer, Jennifer, Toney, Leslie · 2006 · Assessment
  2. Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development.
    Clark, Lee Anna, Watson, David · 1995 · Psychological Assessment
  3. Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments.
    Floyd, Frank J., Widaman, Keith F. · 1995 · Psychological Assessment
  4. Construct Validity of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire in Meditating and Nonmeditating Samples
    Baer, Ruth A., Smith, Gregory T., Lykins, Emily, Button, Daniel, Krietemeyer, Jennifer, Sauer, Shannon, Walsh, Erin, Duggan, Danielle, Williams, J. Mark G. · 2008 · Assessment
  5. Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods.
    Haynes, Stephen N., Richard, David C. S., Kubany, Edward S. · 1995 · Psychological Assessment

See all 311

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Methodological considerations in the refinement of clinical assessment instruments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//1040-3590.7.3.300
The paper
Smith, G. T., & McCarthy, D. M. (1995). Methodological considerations in the refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1037//1040-3590.7.3.300

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.