The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Handbook of bereavement research: Consequences, coping, and care.
Abstract
New research continues to challenge our assumptions about the fundamental nature and course of grief: its roots in our biology, our emotions, and our social interactions. The of Bereavement Research provides a broad view of diverse contemporary approaches to bereavement, examining both normal adaptation and complicated manifestations of grief. In this volume, leading interdisciplinary scholars focus on three important themes in bereavement research: consequences, coping and care. In exploring the consequences of bereavement, authors examine developmental factors that influence grief both for the individual and the family at different phases of the life cycle. In exploring coping, they describe exciting new empirical studies about how people can and do cope with grief, without professional intervention. People do not grieve alone, so chapters on coping present new ways to understand grief at an interpersonal level as well. Until recently, intervention for the bereaved has not been scientifically guided and has become the subject of challenging differences of opinion and approach. Chapters in the care section of the volume critically examine interventions to date and provide guidance for assessment and more empirically guided treatment strategies. The Handbook provides an up-to-date comprehensive review of scientific knowledge about bereavement in an authoritative yet accessible way that should be useful reading for researchers, practitioners and health care professionals in the 21st century.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“and the more severe the grief process (irrespective of the cause of death), the more chance that therapeutic interventions will have positive results [31].”
From Essential Questions on Suicide Bereavement and Postvention (2011) · cites this paper as [31]
Citations
Cites
“Stress: appraisal and coping,”
Folkman, S. (2013) · Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1005-9_215 · Cited by 27,833
(1969) · Cited by 18,340
Handbook of attachment: theory, research, and clinical applications
(1999) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.37-1841 · Cited by 5,386
SYMPTOMATOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT OF ACUTE GRIEF
Lindemann, E. (1944) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.101.2.141 · Cited by 3,308
The myths of coping with loss.
Wortman, C. B., & Silver, R. C. (1989) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.57.3.349 · Cited by 938
Grief Counseling and Grief Therapy: A Handbook for the Mental Health Practitioner
Worden, J. W. (1982) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 805
(1993) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511664076 · Cited by 524
Shuchter, S. R., & Zisook, S. (1993) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511664076.003 · Cited by 327
Death and Bereavement Across Cultures
Parkes, C. M., Laungani, P., & Young, B. (2003) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203435199 · Cited by 210
Bereavement: Studies of grief in adult life, 2nd ed.
Parkes, C. M. (1987) · Cited by 194
Silverman, P. R. (1986) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 69
Myths and Misconceptions about Bereavement: The Opening of a Debate
Stroebe, M., van den Bout, J., & Schut, H. A. W. (1994) · OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying · doi:10.2190/wmdd-ehkm-375w-mbgc · Cited by 45
Self-citationAiken, L. R. (2000) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781410606143-20 · Cited by 4
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Park, C. L. (2010) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0018301 · Cited by 3,174
Prolonged grief disorder: psychometric validation of criteria proposed for DSM-V and ICD-11
Prigerson, H. G., Horowitz, M. J., Jacobs, S. C., Parkes, C. M., Aslan, M., Goodkin, K., Raphael, B., Marwit, S. J., Wortman, C., Neimeyer, R. A., et al. (2009) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000121 · Cited by 1,863
Health outcomes of bereavement.
Stroebe, M., Schut, H., & Stroebe, W. (2007) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61816-9 · Cited by 1,746
Self-citationPsychological resilience, positive emotions, and successful adaptation to stress in later life.
Ong, A. D., Bergeman, C. S., Bisconti, T. L., & Wallace, K. A. (2006) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.4.730 · Cited by 1,697
Meaning reconstruction & the experience of loss.
(2001) · American Psychological Association eBooks · doi:10.1037/10397-000 · Cited by 1,088
Metadata
- Authors
- Stroebe, M., Hansson, R. O., Stroebe, W., & Schut, H. A. W.
- Affiliations
- Utrecht University (NL)
- Venue
- American Psychological Association eBooks
- Publisher
- American Psychological Association
- Published
- 2001
- OpenAlex
- W319435564
- Cited by
- 947
- References
- 13
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 48 · 2014: 47 · 2013: 66 · 2012: 70
- FWCI
- 27.26
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Psychological Association eBooks (publishedVersion)
- DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Keywords
- bereavement, grief, complicated grief, coping with grief, bereavement interventions, grief assessment, family bereavement, life cycle
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
