Interventions for antisocial behavior: Overview.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
More than 40 years of behavioral research shows that high levels of coercive interactions can be selected for within families in a tragic coevolutionary race to the bottom.
“More than 40 years of research from within the behavioral tradition shows how high levels of coercive interactions can be selected for within families in a tragic coevolutionary race to the bottom (Forgatch et al. 2008; Patterson 1982; Reid et al. 2002).”
From Evolving the future: Toward a science of intentional change (2014) · cites this paper as Reid et al. 2002
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Evolving the future: Toward a science of intentional change
Wilson, D. S., Hayes, S. C., Biglan, A., & Embry, D. D. (2014) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x13001593 · Cited by 255 · see citing works
- Authors
- Reid, J. B., & Eddy, J. M.
- ORCID
- Eddy, J. Mark
- Venue
- Antisocial behavior in children and adolescents: A developmental analysis and model for intervention.
- Publisher
- American Psychological Association
- Published
- 2002
- Pages
- 195-201
- OpenAlex
- W2493325068
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.86
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Psychological Association eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
- Keywords
- antisocial behavior, intervention, aggression
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review