The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Assessment of children, 3rd ed.
Sattler, J. M. (1988) · Cited by 699
Assessment Practices of School Psychologists: Ten Years Later
Hutton, J. B., Dubes, R. G., & Muir, S. L. (1992) · School Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/02796015.1992.12085614 · Cited by 136
Cited by
Developmental potential in the first 5 years for children in developing countries
Grantham-McGregor, S., Cheung, Y. B., Cueto, S., Glewwe, P., Richter, L., & Strupp, B. (2007) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(07)60032-4 · Cited by 3,630
On the capacity of attention: Its estimation and its role in working memory and cognitive aptitudes
Cowan, N., Elliott, E. M., Scott Saults, J., Morey, C. C., Mattox, S., Hismjatullina, A., & Conway, A. R. A. (2005) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2004.12.001 · Cited by 1,144
Universal intelligence: a definition of machine intelligence
Legg, S., & Hutter, M. (2007) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1007/s11023-007-9079-x · Cited by 803
Moffitt, T. E. (1990) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1990.tb02830.x · Cited by 822
McConachie, H., & Diggle, T. (2007) · Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2006.00674.x · Cited by 627
Metadata
- Authors
- Paolitto, A. W., & Naglieri, J. A.
- Venue
- Encyclopedia of psychology, Vol. 7.
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2000
- Pages
- 461-463
- OpenAlex
- W2784359719
- Cited by
- 668
- References
- 2
- Type
- reference entry
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/10522-192
- The paper
- Paolitto, A. W., & Naglieri, J. A. (2000). Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale. Encyclopedia of psychology, Vol. 7. https://doi.org/10.1037/10522-192
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
