Cited by 803Psychiatry, Mental Health, NeuroscienceArtificial Intelligence ApplicationsComputability, Logic, AI Algorithms

Universal intelligence: a definition of machine intelligence

Open access
Legg, Shane, Hutter, Marcus·2007·Minds and Machines

Abstract

A fundamental problem in artificial intelligence is that nobody really knows what intelligence is. The problem is especially acute when we need to consider artificial systems which are significantly different to humans. In this paper we approach this problem in the following way: we take a number of well known informal definitions of human intelligence that have been given by experts, and extract their essential features. These are then mathematically formalised to produce a general measure of intelligence for arbitrary machines. We believe that this equation formally captures the concept of machine intelligence in the broadest reasonable sense. We then show how this formal definition is related to the theory of universal optimal learning agents. Finally, we survey the many other tests and definitions of intelligence that have been proposed for machines.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11023-007-9079-x

Cites

111 of 111 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Highly intelligent agents are very effective at achieving their goals.

    “Furthermore, we should expect highly intelligent agents to be very effective at achieving their goals [Legg and Hutter, 2007].”

    From The alignment problem from a deep learning perspective (2022) · cites this paper as Legg and Hutter, 2007

  • The Legg and Hutter definition draws from a 'mainstream scientific definition of intelligence' developed by Linda Gottfredson.

    “The Legg and Hutter definition is a good example here: they draw from a 'mainstream scientific definition of intelligence', a public statement published in the Wall Street Journal in 1994, as developed by Linda Gottrfredson.”

    From Abundant intelligences: placing AI within Indigenous knowledge frameworks (2025) · cites this paper as Legg and Hutter 2007

  • Legg and Hutter's conception relies heavily on a framework built on the idea of hierarchy between races and the measurability of that hierarchy via intelligence tests.

    “Legg and Hutter's only disclaimer about this is to say that they do not completely agree with Gottfredson's definition (Legg and Hutter 2007, p. 12); however, their conception relies heavily on this framework that is built on the idea of hierarchy between races and the measurability of that hierarchy via intelligence tests.”

    From Abundant intelligences: placing AI within Indigenous knowledge frameworks (2025) · cites this paper as Legg and Hutter 2007

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Legg, S., & Hutter, M.
Affiliations
Dalle Molle Institute for Artificial Intelligence Research (CH)
Corresponding author
Legg, Shane
Venue
Minds and Machines
Published
2007-11-10
Volume
17
Issue
4
Pages
391-444
ISSN
  • 0924-6495 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-8641
OpenAlex
W2101493843
Cited by
803
References
111
Citations by year
2026: 86 · 2025: 113 · 2024: 71 · 2023: 89 · 2022: 63 · 2021: 60 · 2020: 65 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 23
FWCI
14.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Minds and Machines (publishedVersion)
  • reroDoc Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Psychiatry, Mental Health, Neuroscience
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
Keywords
machine intelligence, definition of intelligence, universal intelligence, human intelligence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review