The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.
The scope of psychology.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In mammalian brains, consciousness is associated with awareness, memory, and executive function [23–37].”
From The Problem with Phi: A Critique of Integrated Information Theory (2015) · cites this paper as [23]
In the citing paper
“Aaronson’s use of consciousness is therefore consistent with the way the term is used in cognitive neuroscience, psychology, and neurology/psychiatry (and also with the way most philosophers talk about consciousness) [23–37].”
From The Problem with Phi: A Critique of Integrated Information Theory (2015) · cites this paper as [23]
In the citing paper
“Given that when most neuroscientists and psychologists (to say nothing of neurologists!) speak of consciousness they have cognitive-consciousness in mind, it seems fair to say the default use of the term consciousness refers to cognitive-consciousness [23–37].”
From The Problem with Phi: A Critique of Integrated Information Theory (2015) · cites this paper as [23]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The human amygdala and the emotional evaluation of sensory stimuli
Zald, D. H. (2003) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0165-0173(02)00248-5 · Cited by 1,062
Beyond Combination: How Cosmic Consciousness Grounds Ordinary Experience
SHANI, I., & KEPPLER, J. (2018) · Journal of the American Philosophical Association · doi:10.1017/apa.2018.30 · Cited by 91
Metadata
- Authors
- James, W.
- Corresponding author
- James, William
- ORCID
- James, William
- Venue
- The principles of psychology, Vol I.
- Publisher
- Henry Holt and Co
- Published
- 2004-10-27
- Pages
- 1-11
- OpenAlex
- W2493261327
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 18
- FWCI
- 3.38
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Henry Holt and Company eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › General Psychology › Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Philosophy and Phenomenology Studies
- Keywords
- scope of psychology, definition of psychology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The scope of psychology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/10538-001
- The paper
- James, W. (2004). The scope of psychology. The principles of psychology, Vol I. https://doi.org/10.1037/10538-001
