Cited by 150Qualitative Research Methods and ApplicationsAcademic and Historical Perspectives in PsychologyQualitative Research Methods and Ethics

Dancing through minefields: Toward a qualitative stance in psychology.

Marecek, Jeanne·2003·Qualitative research in psychology: Expanding perspectives in methodology and design.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/10595-004

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marecek, J.
Affiliations
Swarthmore College (US)
Corresponding author
Marecek, Jeanne
Venue
Qualitative research in psychology: Expanding perspectives in methodology and design.
Published
2003
Pages
49-69
OpenAlex
W1935018740
Cited by
150
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 7
FWCI
29.88
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Psychological Association eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • Works - Scholarship, Research, & Creative Expression (Swarthmore College) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › General Psychology › Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
Keywords
qualitative research, qualitative psychology, research methodology, epistemology of psychology, qualitative versus quantitative methods

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review