Cited by 45Crime, Deviance, and Social ControlPsychoanalysis and Social CritiquePsychology and Mental Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Deviation, rejection and communication.

Schachter, Stanley·1950·Theory and experiment in social communication.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/10646-004

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Schachter, S.
Corresponding author
Schachter, Stanley
Venue
Theory and experiment in social communication.
Published
1950
Pages
51-82
OpenAlex
W4255501585
Cited by
42
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
482.00
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Research Center for Dynamics Institute for Social Research eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime, Deviance, and Social Control
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Psychoanalysis and Social Critique
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
Keywords
deviation, rejection, communication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review