The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measuring psychological uncertainty: Verbal versus numeric methods.
Abstract
The authors argue that alternatives to the traditional numeric methods of measuring people's uncertainty may prove to hold important advantages under some conditions. In 3 experiments, the authors compared verbal measures involving responses such as very likely, and numeric measures involving responses such as 80% chance. The verbal measures were found to show more sensitivity to various manipulations affecting psychological uncertainty (Experiment 1), to be better predictors of individual preferences among options with unknown outcomes (Experiment 2), and to be better predictors of behavioral intentions (Experiment 3). Results suggest that numeric measures tend to elicit deliberate and rule-based reasoning from respondents, whereas verbal measures allow for more associative and intuitive thinking. Given that there may be many types of situations in which human decisions and behaviors are not based on deliberate and rule-based thinking, numeric measures may misrepresent how individuals think about uncertainty in those situations.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Second, social science research shows that, in human communication, expressing (un)certainty through natural language is often preferred and perceived as more intuitive than numerical expressions [34, 60, 106, 112, 121].”
From "I'm Not Sure, But...": Examining the Impact of Large Language Models' Uncertainty Expression on User Reliance and Trust (2024) · cites this paper as [112]
Citations
Cites
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · Cited by 91,532
Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk
Kahneman, D. J., & Tversky, A. (1988) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511609220.014 · Cited by 32,720
James, W. (1891) · Personality Culture Society · doi:10.1037/11059-000 · Cited by 25,876
Bruner, J. (1986) · doi:10.4159/9780674029019 · Cited by 8,657
Statistical Methods for Psychology.
Gudgeon, A. C., & Howell, D. C. (1994) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series D (The Statistician) · doi:10.2307/2348956 · Cited by 8,277
Actual Minds, Possible Worlds.
Mergler, N. L., Schleifer, R., & Bruner, J. S. (1986) · MLN · doi:10.2307/2905728 · Cited by 6,626
Handbook of Personality : Theory and Research
Pervin, L. A. (1992) · Cited by 4,543
The empirical case for two systems of reasoning.
Sloman, S. A. (1996) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.1.3 · Cited by 3,942
(1967) · Cited by 3,831
Health Belief Model and Personal Health Behavior
Becker, M. H. (1976) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,065
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 327
The role of vagueness in the numerical translation of verbal probabilities: A fuzzy approach
Bocklisch, F., Bocklisch, S. F., Baumann, M. R. K., Scholz, A., & Krems, J. F. (2010) · Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) · doi:10.5167/uzh-136034 · Cited by 6
Which measures of perceived vulnerability predict protective intentions—and when?
Stuart, J. O., Windschitl, P. D., Bossard, E., Bruchmann, K., Smith, A. R., Rose, J. P., & Suls, J. M. (2023) · Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10865-023-00439-1 · Cited by 5
Self-citationExperimental Tests of Risk Ladders in the Elicitation of Perceived Likelihood
Persoskie, A., & Downs, J. S. (2015) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.1858 · Cited by 5
Stability and the Lottery Paradox
Leitgeb, H. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108379755.009 · Cited by 5
Norm perception and communication for vasovagal symptoms in blood donation
Rose, J. P., Geers, A. L., France, J. L., & France, C. R. (2014) · Transfusion · doi:10.1111/trf.12625 · Cited by 5
Are smokers too optimistic about their health status: Ex ante perception versus ex post observation
Hsieh, C., & Lo, T.-F. (2017) · China Economic Review · doi:10.1016/j.chieco.2017.01.013 · Cited by 5
Au, W. T., Rohrmann, B., Taylor, P., Ho, J. M. C., & Yeung, S. (2010) · Asian Journal Of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-839x.2010.01333.x · Cited by 5
The framing of risks and the communication of subjective probabilities for victimizations
Krumpal, I., Rauhut, H., Böhr, D., & Naumann, E. (2010) · Quality & Quantity · doi:10.1007/s11135-010-9336-6 · Cited by 8
Implementing a cognition cycle with words computation
Oskooyee, K. S., Kashani, M. M. R., & Harounabadi, A. (2011) · IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence, Cognitive Algorithms, Mind, and Brain (CCMB) · doi:10.1109/ccmb.2011.5952124 · Cited by 5
Using risk model judgements to better understand perceptions of synergistic risks
Dawson, I. G. J., JOHNSON, J. E. V., & Luke, M. A. (2014) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjop.12059 · Cited by 5
Windschitl, P. D., & Križan, Z. (2005) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.505 · Cited by 5
Self-citationHeffetz, O., & Ishai, G. (2021) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w29452 · Cited by 5
Svahn, C. (2013) · KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) · Cited by 5
Iurev, R., Garcı́a-Lapresta, J. L., García-Encina, P. A., Bolado, S., & Molinos‐Senante, M. (2025) · City and Environment Interactions · doi:10.1016/j.cacint.2025.100193 · Cited by 4
Collsiöö, A., Juslin, P., & Winman, A. (2023) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105584 · Cited by 4
Lebensfeld, T. C., & Smalarz, L. (2024) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105841 · Cited by 6
The Vagueness of Verbal Probability and Frequency Expressions
Bocklisch, F. (2011) · Cited by 4
Graphical representation of statistical information in situations of judgment and decision-making
Inbar, O. (2007) · European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics · doi:10.1145/1362550.1362605 · Cited by 4
Olchowska-Kotala, A. (2019) · Journal of Psycholinguistic Research · doi:10.1007/s10936-019-09666-7 · Cited by 4
Development of a Short Scale to Measure Sustainable Product Involvement
Conejo, F. J., Rojas, W., Zamora, A. L., & Young, C. E. (2021) · Revista Nacional de Administración · doi:10.22458/rna.v12i1.3503 · Cited by 4
Laypeople’s interpretations of ‘high confidence’
Pennekamp, P., & Mansour, J. K. (2024) · Psychology Crime and Law · doi:10.1080/1068316x.2024.2329707 · Cited by 4
Li, S., Du, X., Li, Q., Xuan, Y.-H., Wang, Y., & Rao, L. (2016) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2015.00717 · Cited by 4
Rational Belief and Statistical Evidence
Nelkin, D. K. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108379755.002 · Cited by 4
Just how comparative are comparative judgments?
Radzevick, J. R., & Moore, D. A. (2013) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.05.001 · Cited by 4
Stretched Rating Scales Cause Guided Responding
Knaüper, B., Stich, C., Yugo, M., & Tate, C. (2008) · Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10410230802056230 · Cited by 4
Lazard, A. J. (2020) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104177 · Cited by 4
Eggleston, T. (1996) · doi:10.31274/rtd-180813-10548 · Cited by 4
Franssen, M., Verstegen, R., Bazilinskyy, P., van der Spek, E. D., & Martens, M. H. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1844980 · Cited by 3
Contextual, Cognitive and Emotional Influences on Risk Perception for Illness
Hevey, D. (2005) · The Irish Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1080/03033910.2005.10446207 · Cited by 3
Modeling transfer of high-order uncertain information.
Herbstritt, M., & Franke, M. (2017) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 3
On the Measurement of Subjective Apprehension Risk
Roche, S. P., Pickett, J. T., Intravia, J., & Thompson, A. J. (2020) · Criminal Justice Review · doi:10.1177/0734016820978827 · Cited by 3
Identifying unfamiliar voices: Examining the system variables of sample duration and parade size
Pautz, N., McDougall, K., Mueller‐Johnson, K., Nolan, F., Paver, A., & Smith, H. M. J. (2023) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1177/17470218231155738 · Cited by 5
Physical body experiences questionnaire simplified for active aging (PBE-QAG): Rasch validation
Deng, W., Carpentier, S. T., & de Winckel, A. V. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0280198 · Cited by 2
Roesler, E., Rieger, T., & Langer, M. (2024) · Computers in Human Behavior Artificial Humans · doi:10.1016/j.chbah.2024.100116 · Cited by 4
Attitudes toward biomedical technology and products in South Korea
Park, E., Kim, K. J., & Kwon, S. J. (2015) · Health and Technology · doi:10.1007/s12553-015-0120-4 · Cited by 3
Baghal, T. A. (2014) · Journal of Methods and Measurement in the Social Sciences · doi:10.2458/v5i2.18476 · Cited by 3
Staffel, J. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108379755.005 · Cited by 3
Heurtebise, J. (2015) · doi:10.1002/9781118739044.ch27 · Cited by 3
Tenney, E. R., Meikle, N. L., Hunsaker, D., Moore, D. A., & Anderson, C. P. (2018) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/72nce · Cited by 3
Cognitive and Representational Cues for Assigning Weight to Numerical Information in Decision-Making
Rinne, L. F. (2010) · ProQuest Demo Repository · Cited by 3
Fuzzy Logic Interferences in Medicine ”Medical Verbal Diagnosis and Treatment Methods are Fuzzy”
Şen, Z. (2022) · BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBLISHERS eBooks · doi:10.2174/9789815050806122010010 · Cited by 2
Probabilistic risk aversion for generalized rank-dependent functions
Wang, R., & Wu, Q. (2024) · Economic Theory · doi:10.1007/s00199-024-01610-8 · Cited by 2
Verbal and Numeric Eyewitness Confidence Differentially Affect Decision‐Making
Pennekamp, P. (2025) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.70030 · Cited by 2
Carr, S. M. A., & Bruer, K. C. (2025) · Psychology Crime and Law · doi:10.1080/1068316x.2025.2466079 · Cited by 2
Anuradha, J. M. P. N. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-15-3673-1_19 · Cited by 2
Anaz, N. (2013) · Cited by 2
Definitely maybe and possibly even probably: efficient communication of higher-order uncertainty.
Herbstritt, M., & Franke, M. (2016) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 2
Baghal, T. A. (2014) · Journal of Methods and Measurement in the Social Sciences · doi:10.2458/jmm.v5i2.18476 · Cited by 2
Probability expression for changeable and changeless uncertainties: an implicit test
Wang, Y., Du, X., Rao, L., & Li, S. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01313 · Cited by 2
Effekte der Verbalisierung von Ratingskalen auf die Messqualität
Menold, N. (2018) · Schriftenreihe der ASI · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-24517-7_4 · Cited by 2
Gierusz, J., Koleśnik, K., & Silska-Gembka, S. (2019) · European Financial and Accounting Journal · doi:10.18267/j.efaj.221 · Cited by 2
Approach-avoidance and optimism
Rose, J. P. (2009) · doi:10.17077/etd.07l9y7dz · Cited by 2
Karlsson, P. (2011) · Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs · doi:10.2478/v10199-011-0015-2 · Cited by 2
The communication and influence of confidence and uncertainty
Wesson, C. J. (2005) · OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique) · Cited by 3
Heffetz, O., & Ishai, G. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3859318 · Cited by 2
The impact of consumer knowledge, information mode and presentation form on advertising effects
Nagaraj, S. (2007) · KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) · Cited by 2
広田, す. (2014) · 社会心理学研究 · doi:10.14966/jssp.30.2_121 · Cited by 1
On Benchmarking Human-like Intelligence in Machines
Ying, L., Collins, K. M., Wong, L., Sucholutsky, I., Liu, R., Weller, A., Shu, T., Griffiths, T. L., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2026) · Open Mind · doi:10.1162/opmi.a.385 · Cited by 39
Assessing numeracy in oncology: The role of patient perception and preferences
Kilkus, J. L. (2012) · UKnowledge (University of Kentucky) · Cited by 1
Baghal, A., & Tarek, M. (2012) · Cited by 1
Choi, Y. (2013) · Lincoln (University of Nebraska) · Cited by 1
Baghal, T. A. (2014) · Journal of Methods and Measurement in the Social Sciences · doi:10.2458/azu_jmmss.v5i2.18476 · Cited by 1
Kalıpçı, M. B. (2024) · International Journal of Tourism Cities · doi:10.1108/ijtc-08-2023-0167 · Cited by 1
Numerical versus graphical aids for decision-making in a multi-cue signal identification task
Szulc, J., & Fletcher, K. I. (2024) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2024.104260 · Cited by 1
Ferreira, L. O. G., & de Lima, D. V. (2012) · Revista de Educação e Pesquisa em Contabilidade (REPeC) · doi:10.17524/repec.v6i1.152 · Cited by 1
Lermer, E., Streicher, B., Raue, M., & Frey, D. (2019) · Risk engineering · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-11456-5_6 · Cited by 1
On the Identification of Critical Questions in the PISA for Schools Program
Rico, N., Alonso, P., Muñiz‐Rodríguez, L., Pérez‐Fernández, R., Rodríguez-Muñiz, L. J., & Dı́az, I. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-61705-9_59 · Cited by 1
Rethinking the Lottery Paradox
Douven, I., & Elqayam, S. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108379755.007 · Cited by 1
An Examination of Dweck’s Psychological Needs Model in Relation to Exercise-Related Well-Being
Wierts, C. M., Zumbo, B. D., Rhodes, R. E., Faulkner, G., & Beauchamp, M. R. (2021) · Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology · doi:10.1123/jsep.2021-0026 · Cited by 2
Rose, J. P., Edmonds, K. A., Aspiras, O. G., Kumar, M., Scamaldo, K. M., Richmond, J. R., Tull, M. T., & Gratz, K. L. (2022) · Psychology Health & Medicine · doi:10.1080/13548506.2021.2023750 · Cited by 1
How Much Risk, and Risk of What? A Closer Look at Pretrial Rearrest and Risk Assessment
Moore, C., Ferguson, E., Severson, A., & Guerin, P. (2026) · Criminal Justice Policy Review · doi:10.1177/08874034261428143 · Cited by 1
Uncertainty in the physical, social, and virtual worlds
Smithson, M. J. (2002) · Annual Meeting of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society (NAFIPS) · doi:10.1109/nafips.2000.877374 · Cited by 1
Akter, S., & Bennett, J. W. (2010) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.22004/ag.econ.94942 · Cited by 1
Hoffmann, A. O. I., & Post, T. (2013) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2361352 · Cited by 1
Edgcumbe, D. R. (2018) · UEL Research Repository (University of East London) · doi:10.15123/uel.86z83 · Cited by 1
Predicting Outcomes in a Sequence of Binary Events: Belief Updating and Gambler’s Fallacy ReasoningPreprint
Rao, K., & Hastie, R. (2020) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3597264 · Cited by 1
Uncertainty, Precaution & Perception: Communicating the Risk of Heading in Football
Gilbert, A. W. (2021) · Otago University Research Archive (University of Otago) · Cited by 1
Coherent Attributions with Co-occurring and Interacting Causes
Jennings, K. E. (2010) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 1
editors, T. (1999) · JNCI Monographs · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jncimonographs.a024208 · Cited by 1
Park, K. F., & Shapira, Z. (2018) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/978-1-137-00772-8_250 · Cited by 1
Interactive graphics for communicating health risks
Ancker, J. S. (2009) · ProQuest Demo Repository
Spontaneous judgements of health related-risk
Brown, M. G. (2012)
Factors explaining the risk perception of county emergency managers
Huibregtse, J. N. (2014) · NDSU Repository (North Dakota State University)
Fokus kvantifikatora u hrvatskom jeziku na zadatku nadopunjavanja rečenica
Bajšanski, I., & Valerjev, P. (2014) · Psihologijske teme
[Strategies of clinical hypothesis testing].
Godoy, A., Lázaro, A. G., & Ortiz, M. T. A. (2008) · PubMed
Older Adults’ Comprehension of Probabilistic Risk Expressions in a Vaccine Information Statement
Fausset, C. B., Rogers, W., & Fisk, A. D. (2011) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/1071181311551412
Kovač, V. B., & Rise, J. (2012) · Europe’s Journal of Psychology · doi:10.5964/ejop.v8i3.479
Oskooyee, K. S., Kashani, M. M. R., & Jangjou, M. (2011) · IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE) · doi:10.1109/fuzzy.2011.6007340
AMBIGUITY AND ANXIETY IN THE PROCESSING OF HEALTH RISK MESSAGES
Issar, S. (2005) · eCommons (Cornell University)
Schmälzle, R. (2009)
On having a 200% chance: Additivity neglect in probability estimates
Riege, A. (2016) · NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives
Using Verbal Probability to Measure Uncertainty:Features and Problems
Du, X., Jie-Hong, X., Yin, S., & Li, S. (2013) · Advances in Psychological Science · doi:10.3724/sp.j.1042.2012.00651
Construcción de una escala para medir la personalidad de las tiendas comerciales
Ferrer, G. G., & García, C. G. (2015)
I will probably understand you best of all : optimism in interpreting health messages
Smits, T. (2009) · Lirias
Romero, M. (2016) · Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida)
Acera (2009)
A half full glass may seem fuller than a half empty one
de Ruyter, J. C., Wetzels, M. G. M., & Daryanto, A. (2004)
Ferreira, L. O. G., & de Lima, D. V. (2012)
Metadata
- Authors
- Windschitl, P. D., & Wells, G. L.
- Affiliations
- Iowa State University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied
- Published
- 1996-12
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 343-364
- ISSN
- 1076-898X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2192
- OpenAlex
- W2000688897
- Cited by
- 326
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 4.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Risk Perception and Management
- Keywords
- psychological uncertainty, decision making under uncertainty, behavioral intention, intuitive thinking, deliberative reasoning, preference prediction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review