Adaptive automation, trust, and self-confidence in fault management of time-critical tasks.

Moray, Neville, Inagaki, Toshiyuki, Itoh, Makoto·2000·Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied

Abstract

An experiment on adaptive automation is described. Reliability of automated fault diagnosis, mode of fault management (manual vs. automated), and fault dynamics affect variables including root mean square error, avoidance of accidents and false shutdowns, subjective trust in the system, and operator self-confidence. Results are discussed in relation to levels of automation, models of trust and self-confidence, and theories of human-machine function allocation. Trust in automation but not self-confidence was strongly affected by automation reliability. Operators controlled a continuous process with difficulty only while performing fault management but could prevent unnecessary shutdowns. Final authority for decisions and action must be allocated to automation in time-critical situations.

Cites (5)

  1. Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse
    Parasuraman, Raja, Riley, Victor · 1997 · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
  2. Level of automation effects on performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task
    ENDSLEY, MICA R., KABER, DAVID B. · 1999 · Ergonomics
  3. Trust in automation. Part II. Experimental studies of trust and human intervention in a process control simulation
    MUIR, BONNIE M., MORAY, NEVILLE · 1996 · Ergonomics
  4. Trust in automation: Part I. Theoretical issues in the study of trust and human intervention in automated systems
    MUIR, BONNIE M. · 1994 · Ergonomics
  5. A Quantitative Measure for Degree of Automation and Its Relation to System Performance and Mental Load
    Wei, Zhi-Gang, Macwan, Anil P., Wieringa, Peter A. · 1998 · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

Show all 5 references

Cited by (32)

  1. A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation
    Parasuraman, R., Sheridan, T.B., Wickens, C.D. · 2000 · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans
  2. Trust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate Reliance
    Lee, J. D., See, K. A. · 2004 · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
  3. The role of trust in automation reliance
    Dzindolet, Mary T., Peterson, Scott A., Pomranky, Regina A., Pierce, Linda G., Beck, Hall P. · 2003 · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
  4. Automation bias: a systematic review of frequency, effect mediators, and mitigators
    Goddard, Kate, Roudsari, Abdul, Wyatt, Jeremy C · 2012 · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
  5. A Meta-Analysis of Factors Influencing the Development of Trust in Automation: Implications for Understanding Autonomy in Future Systems
    Schaefer, Kristin E., Chen, Jessie Y. C., Szalma, James L., Hancock, P. A. · 2016 · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

See all 345

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adaptive automation, trust, and self-confidence in fault management of time-critical tasks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//1076-898x.6.1.44
The paper
Moray, N., Inagaki, T., & Itoh, M. (2000). Adaptive automation, trust, and self-confidence in fault management of time-critical tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied. https://doi.org/10.1037//1076-898x.6.1.44

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.